Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;270(3):1478–1486. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11458-4

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of clinical features associated with MuSK MG in comparison to double seronegative generalized MG (dSNMG) and motor neuron disease (MND)

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
MuSK MG vs. dSNMG
 Age at onset 1.00 0.97–1.03 0.952
 Sex 7.45 2.30–24.12 0.001 10.01 2.42–41.31 0.001
 Ocular form at onset 2.36 0.76–7.36 0.138 5.17 1.08–24.79 0.040
 Abnormal RNST result 1.80 0.63–5.16 0.277
 Pharmacological response: positive 0.67 0.09–4.81 0.688
 Thymic hyperplasia or thymoma 0.73 0.18–3.04 0.669
 MGFA at presentation ≥ 3 1.19 0.39–3.59 0.757
 MGFA B classification at presentation 3.52 1.33–9.27 0.011 3.30 0.94–11.56 0.061
 Myasthenic crisis 5.40 1.80–16.21 0.003 4.51 1.18–17.32 0.028
 MGCS 1.08 1.01–1.16 0.022 1.09 1.00–1.18 0.046
MuSK MG vs. MND
 Age at onset 0.92 0.87–0.97 0.001 0.92 0.86–0.98 0.016
 Sex 6.57 1.83–23.67 0.004 15.47 1.35–176.59 0.028
 Abnormal RNST result 4.96 1.54–15.98 0.007 8.67 1.27–58.99 0.027
 Pharmacologic response: positive 4.80 0.66–35.20 0.123
 MGFA at presentation ≥ 3 0.71 0.21–2.43 0.590
 MGFA B classification at presentation 0.65 0.19–2.20 0.487
 Myasthenic crisis 17.19 2.02–146.25 0.009 115.12 3.50–3783.92 0.008
 MGCS 1.00 0.93–1.07 0.881

The variables of ocular form at onset and thymic hyperplasia or thymoma were excluded from the latter analysis because none of MND patients had neither ocular form at onset nor thymic hyperplasia/thymoma

MGCS myasthenia gravis composite scale, MGFA myasthenia gravis foundation of America, RNST repetitive nerve stimulation test