Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;14:1070. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35961-y

Table 2.

Summary of baseline genomic alterations in patients with valid tissue NGS resulta and by suboptimalb tumor response to treatment or not

Gene/mutation, n (%) All evaluable (N = 104) Suboptimalb responder (n = 23) Not suboptimalb responder (n = 81)
TP53 any known/likely 64 (62) 15 (65) 49 (60)
TP53 frameshift/truncation 26 (25) 2 (9) 24 (30)
TP53 splice 9 (9) 2 (9) 7 (9)
TP53 missense 28 (27) 11 (48) 17 (21)
TP53 homozygous deletion 1 (1) 0 1 (1)
EGFR amplification 21 (20) 7 (30) 14 (17)
RB1 any known/likely 12 (12) 4 (17) 8 (10)
RBM10 truncation/splice 5 (5) 4 (17) 1 (1)
SMARCA4 missense/truncation 3 (3) 3 (13) 0
RICTOR amplification 3 (3) 3 (13) 0
HER2 amplification/missense 3 (3) 3 (13) 0
MET amplification 3 (3) 2 (9) 1 (1)
AKT2 any known/likely 2 (2) 2 (9) 0
CDK6 any known/likely 2 (2) 2 (9) 0
FGF23 any known/likely 2 (2) 2 (9) 0
BRCA2 any known/likely 2 (2) 2 (9) 0
APC any known/likely 6 (6) 3 (13) 3 (4)

EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor.

aKnown/likely refers to alterations either known or likely to have a functional impact on a given protein, as determined by the algorithm described in Carr et al.49.

bPatients whose tumors had a suboptimal response were defined by either a best overall response of stable disease or progressive disease with a PFS of <6 months, or non-clearance of plasma ctDNA measured by ddPCR at 6 weeks.