Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 16;14(1):87–99. doi: 10.1007/s13167-023-00316-6

Table 3.

Vessel parameter for three branch level sub-groups

1 2 3 p
Artery
Vessel number Control 93 204 87
POAG 159 273 48
Mean deviation-(SEM), dB POAG  − 3.7 (0.5)  − 4.4 (0.4)  − 3.1 (0.6) 0.117
Diameter-(SEM), MU Control 112.6 (1.7) 91.7 (1.0) 83.7 (1.3)  < 0.001
POAG 99.4 (1.0) 87.2 (0.8) 80.1 (1.5)  < 0.001
p  < 0.001 0.001 0.128
dila%-(SEM), % over baseline Control 3.7 (0.3) 3.5 (0.1) 3.6 (0.3) 0.908
POAG 4.2 (0.2) 4.1 (0.2) 4.4 (0.4) 0.31
p 0.236 0.617 0.060
constr%-(SEM), % over baseline Control  − 1.8 (0.1)23  − 2.8 (0.1)1  − 3.0 (0.2)1  < 0.001
POAG  − 3.2 (0.2)  − 3.6 (0.2)  − 3.9 (0.4) 0.085
p  < 0.001  < 0.001 0.034§
AUCd-(SEM), % * s Control 39.8 (3.5) 35.1 (1.9) 29.5 (3.0) 0.051
POAG 39.3 (2.8) 36.6 (2.3) 37.7 (4.5) 0.317
p 0.792 0.254 0.070
AUC c-(SEM), % * s Control  − 31.5 (2.9)23  − 52.9 (4.9)1  − 53.5 (5.9)1 0.004
POAG  − 65.2 (6.4)  − 73.8 (4.5)  − 86.6 (14.4) 0.260
p  < 0.001 0.002 0.102
tdila-(SEM), s Control 43.9 (0.7) 43.1 (0.4) 43.3 (0.6) 0.241
POAG 43.4 (0.5) 42.1 (0.4) 40.5 (0.9) 0.01§
p 0.407 0.070 0.009§
tconstr-(SEM), s Control 85.8 (2.8) 79.4 (1.7) 76.4 (2.8) 0.012§
POAG 78.4 (2.0) 80.6 (1.6) 80.9 (3.7) 0.642
p 0.014§ 0.650 0.196
Vein
Vessel number Control 118 184 71
POAG 185 252 75
Mean deviation-(SEM), dB POAG  − 3.3 (0.4)  − 4.0 (0.4)  − 5.4 (0.8) 0.122
Diameter-(SEM), MU Control 133.3 (2.2) 97.8 (1.6) 88.1 (2.5)  < 0.001
POAG 124.9 (1.7) 23 96.8 (1.2) 13 82.6 (1.5) 23  < 0.001
p 0.001 0.851 0.207
dila%-(SEM), % over baseline Control 4.5 (0.2)3 4.1 (0.2) 3.7 (0.2)1 0.018§
POAG 5.2 (0.2) 5.2 (0.2) 4.7 (0.5) 0.126
p 0.073 0.011§ 0.102
constr%-(SEM), % over baseline Control  − 1.7 (0.1) 23  − 2.3 (0.1) 13  − 2.4 (0.3) 12  < 0.001
POAG  − 2.1 (0.1)  − 3.0 (0.2)  − 3.1 (0.2)  < 0.001
p 0.003§ 0.018§ 0.014§
AUCd-(SEM), % * s Control 48.7 (2.5) 23 38.5 (2.2) 1 30.1 (2.6) 1  < 0.001
POAG 54.2 (2.6) 49.4 (3.0) 42.2 (5.4) 0.003
p 0.388 0.055 0.119
AUCc-(SEM), % * s Control  − 24.4 (4.4) 23  − 37.7 (4.3) 1  − 45.2 (11.1) 1  < 0.001
POAG  − 30.8 (3.1) 23  − 55.5 (5.0) 1  − 61.2 (9.8) 1 0.002
p  < 0.001  < 0.002 0.015§
tdila-(SEM), s Control 46.8 (0.4) 2 44.8 (0.4) 1 45.1 (0.6)  < 0.001
POAG 46.3 (0.3) 44.8 (0.3) 44.9 (0.6) 0.02§
p 0.245 0.630 0.867
tconstr-(SEM), s Control 83.7 (3.3) 77.4 (2.7) 77.1 (4.2) 0.352
POAG 87.6 (2.6) 88.4 (2.1) 82.0 (3.8) 0.34
p 0.388 0.002§ 0.502

Mann–Whitney U test. Kruskal–Wallis test. dila%, maximal dilation, peak dilatation during a 20-s flickering period compared to baseline; tdila, time to maximal dilation, time to peak dilatation after flicker onset; constr%, maximal constriction, peak constriction after flicker onset compared to baseline; tconstr, time to maximal constriction, time to reach peak constriction; AUCd, area under the curve above baseline during flicker stimulation; AUCc, area under the response curve below baseline after flicker onset. §Statistical trend