TABLE 5.
Results of robustness check using an alternative dependent measurement.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| RD | RD | PAT2 | PAT2 | |
| FB | −0.003*** | −0.004*** | −0.087* | −0.157*** |
| (−5.13) | (−5.83) | (−1.74) | (−2.84) | |
| FB*MO | 0.011** | 1.101*** | ||
| (2.18) | (3.04) | |||
| MO | 0.007*** | 0.481*** | ||
| (5.02) | (4.91) | |||
| ROA | 0.018*** | 0.016*** | 1.996*** | 1.878*** |
| (5.29) | (4.79) | (11.84) | (11.09) | |
| LEV | 0.002 | 0.002* | 0.039 | 0.056 |
| (1.49) | (1.68) | (0.49) | (0.70) | |
| SIZE | −0.001*** | −0.001*** | 0.218*** | 0.220*** |
| (−5.01) | (−4.84) | (13.61) | (13.74) | |
| SOE | −0.002*** | −0.002*** | 0.021 | 0.035 |
| (−3.93) | (−3.41) | (0.63) | (1.06) | |
| FAGE | −0.004*** | −0.003*** | −0.297*** | −0.280*** |
| (−6.24) | (−5.80) | (−7.17) | (−6.75) | |
| INSHOLD | 0.001 | 0.003*** | −0.113** | −0.003 |
| (1.20) | (3.09) | (−2.11) | (−0.05) | |
| SALEGRO | 0.001* | 0.001 | −0.123*** | −0.129*** |
| (1.70) | (1.56) | (−3.61) | (−3.78) | |
| Tobin’s Q | 0.003*** | 0.003*** | 0.044*** | 0.045*** |
| (13.25) | (13.29) | (3.64) | (3.72) | |
| IDRATIO | −0.004 | −0.005 | 0.032 | −0.023 |
| (−1.32) | (−1.59) | (0.11) | (−0.08) | |
| BSIZE | 0.001 | 0.0002 | 0.034** | 0.034** |
| (1.54) | (1.56) | (3.25) | (3.28) | |
| IND | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| YEAR | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Constant | 0.042*** | 0.040*** | −4.438*** | −4.595*** |
| (9.42) | (8.90) | (−11.19) | (−11.54) | |
| F-value | 203.68*** | 196.6*** | 66.46*** | 64.45*** |
| Adj. R2 | 0.365 | 0.367 | 0.192 | 0.195 |
| N | 12,248 | 12,248 | 12,248 | 12,248 |
t statistics in parentheses; *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.01; heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are used.