Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 28;68(6):2531–2544. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07870-z

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent CWL-ESD or SLC-ESD for superficial gastric neoplasms before propensity score matching

CWL-ESD
n = 42
SLC-ESD
n = 98
P
Age, years,
 Median (IQR) 75 (69–80) 74 (68–81) 0.731
Sex, male/female 30 (71.4)/12 (28.6) 70 (71.4)/28 (28.6) 1.000
Lesion size, mm
 Median (IQR) 12 (8–20) 14 (9–21) 0.341
 Range 1–70 2–57
Lesion location 0.970
 Upper 8 (19.0) 17 (17.3)
 Middle 21 (50.0) 49 (50.0)
 Lower 13 (31.0) 32 (32.7)
Lesion position 0.653
 Greater curvature 8 (19.0) 25 (25.5)
 Lesser curvature 15 (35.7) 39 (39.8)
 Anterior wall 8 (19.0) 16 (16.3)
 Posterior wall 11 (26.2) 18 (18.4)
Morphology 0.075
 Depressed (0–IIc, 0–III) 17 (40.5) 57 (58.2)
 Flat (0–IIb) 2 (4.8) 1 (1.0)
 Protruded (0–I, 0–IIa) 23 (54.8) 40 (40.8)
Histology 0.367
 Adenoma 8 (19.0) 14 (14.3)
 Differentiated adenocarcinoma 31 (73.8) 81 (82.7)
Undifferentiated adenocarcinoma 3 (7.1) 3 (3.1)

Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated

CWL-ESD clip with line-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection, IQR interquartile range, SLC-ESD spring and loop with clip-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection