Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;11(1):e003197. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003197

Table 3.

Association of weighted and unweighted genetic risk scores with log-transformed hsCRP in patients with type 2 diabetes

Variables Log hsCRP
Crude model Adjusted model
n Mean±SD β (SE) F value β (SE) F value
Unweighted genetic risk score, per 1 point 2332 0.25±1.05 0.11 (0.01)* 75.54* 0.11 (0.01)* 39.05*
Tertile 1: 0~2 812 0.03±1.06 ref 33.14* ref 36.12*
Tertile 2: 3~4 766 0.30±1.05 0.27 (0.05)* 0.23 (0.05)*
Tertile 3: >5 754 0.45±0.99 0.42 (0.05)* 0.42 (0.05)*
Weighted genetic risk score, per 1 point 2332 0.25±1.05 0.42 (0.05)* 74.72* 0.43 (0.04)* 40.76*
Tertile 1: 0~0.56 812 0.03±1.06 ref 32.83* ref 37.4*
Tertile 2: 0.57~1.03 759 0.30±1.05 0.27 (0.05)* 0.24 (0.05)*
Tertile 3: >1.03 761 0.44±0.99 0.42 (0.05)* 0.39 (0.05)*

Multivariate model adjusting for covariates that satisfy the MR assumption 2.

*p<0.001.

hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.