Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 28;13(10):6808–6826. doi: 10.1039/d2ra06596g

Convectional/traditional extraction methods.

Methods Process Advantages Disadvantages References
Squeezing The techniques involve the application of pressure on moistened plant samples via pestle, mortars, mullers, presses, etc., on the plant samples to get the extrudate Simple Possibility of contamination of bio-actives 59–61
Little or no solvent required
Requires no thermal degradation
Low extraction efficiency
Maceration Powdered plant samples are added to the solvent already in a stoppered container with frequent agitation. The aqueous extracting solvent is then drained off followed by pressing and centrifugation to remove the remaining miscella from the plant material Can be used for a large amount of sample Long extraction duration 39, 62 and 63
A limited solvent is required
Long extraction time Only useful for soluble or thermolabile bio-actives
Low extraction efficiency
Decoction The plant matrix comes in contact with the aqueous solvent at boiling point for a maximum duration of 30 min. The liquid is then filtered at end of the extraction. Then the liquid is filtered, and the squeezed liquid of the extracted matrix impregnated with the aqueous solvent is added to it Use predominantly for phenolics Only useful for thermoresistant bioactive 64–66
Requires moderate heat Limited validity
Long extraction time Extracts have a short shelf life
Low extraction efficiency
Infusion Extraction in this regard involves soaking the solid plant powder in cold or boiling water for a short time Long extraction time Easily altered extract 4 and 67
Low extraction efficiency Limited validity
Percolation The method makes use of narrow shaped percolator which holds the moistened plant samples. The plant material is then rinsed with the solvent several times until the active ingredient is extracted Easy to operate Good grinding required 68–70
Very fast Requires preliminary humidification
Not exhaustive