Table 2.
Result of regression models for cesarean delivery for partner human capital index (n=24,216).
| Background characteristics | Null model (ie, model without exposure variable) | Odds for cesarean section adjusted for partner human capital index (95% CI) | Odds of cesarean section adjusted for partner human capital index and other (95% CI)a | ||||
| Husband human capital index | |||||||
|
|
Low | —b | 1c | 1 | |||
|
|
Moderate | — | 1.46d (1.36-1.56) | 1.15d (1.07-1.24) | |||
|
|
High | — | 1.61d (1.49-1.74) | 1.24d (1.14-1.35) | |||
| Educational attainment of women | |||||||
|
|
Illiterate | — | — | 1 | |||
|
|
Primary | — | — | 1.30d (1.12-1.51) | |||
|
|
Secondary | — | — | 1.57d (1.40-1.77) | |||
|
|
Secondary and higher | — | — | 1.49d (1.29-1.71) | |||
| Number of antenatal care visit | |||||||
|
|
No visit | — | — | 1 | |||
|
|
1-4 visits | — | — | 0.87 (0.72-1.07) | |||
|
|
>4 visits | — | — | 1.12 (0.92-1.36) | |||
| Parity | |||||||
|
|
1 | — | — | 1 | |||
|
|
2 | — | — | 0.75d (0.70-0.81) | |||
|
|
3+ | — | — | 0.43d (0.39-0.48) | |||
| Place of delivery | |||||||
|
|
Public | — | — | 1 | |||
|
|
Private | — | — | 3.94d (3.67-4.22) | |||
| Wealth index | |||||||
|
|
Poorest | — | — | 1 | |||
|
|
Poorer | — | — | 1.70d (1.50-1.93) | |||
|
|
Middle | — | — | 2.54d (2.24-2.88) | |||
|
|
Richer | — | — | 2.58d (2.27-2.93) | |||
|
|
Richest | — | — | 2.47d (2.15-2.83) | |||
| Null model | 0.32d (0.31-0.33) | — | — | ||||
aReligion, caste, region, and household size were controlled.
bVariables not considered for model analysis.
cReference category.
dP<.001.