Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;25:e41892. doi: 10.2196/41892

Table 2.

Result of regression models for cesarean delivery for partner human capital index (n=24,216).

Background characteristics Null model (ie, model without exposure variable) Odds for cesarean section adjusted for partner human capital index (95% CI) Odds of cesarean section adjusted for partner human capital index and other (95% CI)a
Husband human capital index

Low —b 1c 1

Moderate — 1.46d (1.36-1.56) 1.15d (1.07-1.24)

High — 1.61d (1.49-1.74) 1.24d (1.14-1.35)
Educational attainment of women

Illiterate — — 1

Primary — — 1.30d (1.12-1.51)

Secondary — — 1.57d (1.40-1.77)

Secondary and higher — — 1.49d (1.29-1.71)
Number of antenatal care visit

No visit — — 1

1-4 visits — — 0.87 (0.72-1.07)

>4 visits — — 1.12 (0.92-1.36)
Parity

1 — — 1

2 — — 0.75d (0.70-0.81)

3+ — — 0.43d (0.39-0.48)
Place of delivery

Public — — 1

Private — — 3.94d (3.67-4.22)
Wealth index

Poorest — — 1

Poorer — — 1.70d (1.50-1.93)

Middle — — 2.54d (2.24-2.88)

Richer — — 2.58d (2.27-2.93)

Richest — — 2.47d (2.15-2.83)
Null model 0.32d (0.31-0.33) — —

aReligion, caste, region, and household size were controlled.

bVariables not considered for model analysis.

cReference category.

dP<.001.