Table 4.
Result of logit regression models for cesarean delivery with interaction between partner’s human capital, wealth index, and access to available health services in terms of number of antenatal care visits in India (n=28,305)a.
| Wealth index | Partner human capital: low, odds ratio (95% CI) | Partner human capital: moderate, odds ratio (95% CI) | Partner human capital: high, odds ratio (95% CI) | ||||||||
|
|
No visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 1-4 visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 4 or more visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | No visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 1-4 visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 4 or more visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | No visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 1-4 visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | 4 or more visits, odds ratio (95% CI) | ||
| Poorest | 1 (1.00-1.00) | 0.98 (0.64-1.49) | 3.06b (1.99-4.71) | 0.96 (0.50-1.83) | 1.06 (0.68-1.65) | 2.88b (1.85-4.47) | 0.15c (0.03-0.68) | 1.14 (0.71-1.84) | 2.28d (1.38-3.76) | ||
| Poorer | 1.93c (1.14-3.28) | 2.82b (1.89-4.19) | 5.46b (3.63-8.20) | 2.34d (1.37-4.01) | 2.67b (1.78-4.01) | 5.30b (3.53-7.96) | 2.43d (1.29-4.60) | 3.88b (2.55-5.89) | 6.55b (4.28-10.03) | ||
| Middle | 3.86b (2.24-6.63) | 4.61b (3.10-6.87) | 8.57b (5.74-12.80) | 6.64b (4.04-10.89) | 5.48b (3.67-8.17) | 12.02b (8.15-17.72) | 6.35b (3.62-11.14) | 4.55b (2.95-7.02) | 10.67b (7.15-15.91) | ||
| Richer | 4.87b (2.71-8.78) | 6.57b (4.37-9.86) | 9.68b (6.51-14.40) | 6.87b (4.08-11.56) | 7.79b (5.22-11.62) | 13.42b (9.11-19.76) | 10.19b (5.49-18.91) | 8.34b (5.47-12.70) | 12.98b (8.74-19.27) | ||
| Richest | 6.40b (3.08-13.33) | 6.54b (4.24-10.09) | 12.03b (8.06-17.95) | 8.41b (4.90-14.43) | 10.59b (7.03-15.95) | 15.31b (10.41-22.51) | 14.02b (7.64-25.74) | 12.31b (8.02-18.89) | 22.22b (14.99-32.93) | ||
aReligion, caste, and region were controlled.
bP<.001.
cP<.05.
dP<.01.