Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Jan 25;8(2):721–727. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.2c02251

Tuning the pH of Activation of Fluorinated Hydrazone-Based Switches—A Pathway to Versatile 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents

Dawid Janasik 1, Patrycja Imielska 1, Tomasz Krawczyk 1,*
PMCID: PMC9972467  PMID: 36695323

Abstract

graphic file with name se2c02251_0008.jpg

Molecular switches have become an area of great interest in recent years. They are explored as high-density data storage and organic diodes in molecular electronics as well as chemosensors due to their ability to undergo a transition between well-defined structures under the action of external stimuli. One of the types of such switches is hydrazones. They work by changing the configuration from E to Z under the influence of pH or light. The change in configuration is accompanied by a change in the absorption band and changes in the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum. In this publication, the structure–property relationship of fluorinated hydrazone switches was established. A linear relationship between the Hammett substituent constants and the pH where the switching occurs was found. Introduction of strong electron-donating groups allowed obtaining a hydrazone switch of pKa = 6 suitable for application in 19F MRI as contrast agents.

Keywords: molecular switches, 19F MRI, pH, hydrazone, substituents, structure−property relationship


Measurements of pH are important in many areas of chemical research as well as in agriculture,1 food industry,2 microbiology,3 environmental sciences,4 and in medicine.5 The pH value is typically measured using colorimetric indicators such as methyl orange or phenolphthalein6 or with more accurate potentiometric methods.7 In medical diagnostics, besides classical chemical methods, imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also applied for pH measurements.8,9

MRI is a noninvasive and widely used technique for imaging soft tissues with a spatial resolution of approximately 1 mm.911 It takes advantage of the magnetic properties of 1H nuclei of ubiquitous water molecules.12,13 Another, complementary, approach is the use of the resonance of 19F nuclei. Because fluorine is not common in organisms except for bones and teeth, only 19F nuclei introduced with a contrast agent can be observed.14,15 This offers a negligible background signal and high selectivity compared to the 1H MRI technique.1619 On the other hand, high concentrations of fluorinated contrast agents are required, usually in the 1–10 mM9 range compared with traditional 1H contrast agents where only 0.05–0.1 mM are needed.10 The method is extensively researched with numerous ingenious inventions that open up newer and newer possibilities and bring the technique closer to medical applications.9 The most promising area of 19F MRI research is so-called intelligent or smart contrast agents,2022 offering the possibility of imaging of enzymatic activity,23 the presence of specific ions,24 temperature,25 oxygenation,26 or pH.22,27 The latter is mostly used for imaging tumors based on the differences in acidity (pH 5–7) compared with healthy tissues (pH 7.4).28,29

Many pH-sensitive agents have been proposed for 19F MRI such as PEGylated nanogels containing perfluorocarbons,30 fluorinated pyridoxine,31 C6F6-loaded Au-fluorescent mesoporous silica nanoparticles,32 or copolymers3335 that rely on the volume phase transition, decomposition, or isomerization as mechanisms of signal activation. Recently, we proposed molecular switches as potential 19F MRI agents.36 The main advantage is that no external reference either for chemical shift31 or for concentration33 is necessary, as they act as ratiometric probes not affected by differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of a probe and a reference.

A molecular switch is defined as a molecule capable of reversibly shifting between two (or more) thermodynamically stable states.3740 The main advantage of molecular switches is the possibility of precise control of their properties using external stimuli. There are several classes of molecular switches, including photochromic, host–guest, rotaxanes, and hydrazones.38

Hydrazones as molecular switches were proposed in 2009 by Aprahamian.41 The use of the hydrazone moiety in conjunction with the pyridyl and ester groups allowed facile E/Z isomerization due to rotation about a N=C hydrazone bond in response to pH changes or other stimuli.

As a result of the configuration change, the hydrazone molecular switch changes its absorption band, 1H NMR, and, if a fluoroorganic group is appropriately introduced, also 19F NMR spectrum,36 which facilitates 19F MR imaging of the pH gradient. In the case of a native hydrazone switch bearing a single CF3 or F functional group, the switching process takes place in the pH range of 3–4,9 which is adequate for the gastric environment42 but insufficient for tumor imaging (5.0–6.5).28

Earlier work by the Aprahamian group indicated that the substitution of the aniline aromatic ring of a hydrazone switch affects the strength of the N–H···N hydrogen bond.43,44 Essentially, its strength was lowered with the electron-donating effect of the substituent, leading to the decreased pKa of hydrazones. However, the extent to which the pH range of isomerization can be shifted by substitution of either a pyridine ring or an aniline ring was unclear. This question prompted us to investigate how hydrazone-based switches should be modified to precisely tune the pH of the transition process to the physiologically relevant pH range of 6–7.

For this purpose, a series of hydrazone switches containing a single −CF3 moiety as well as electron-donating (EDG) or electron-withdrawing (EWG) groups in both aromatic rings of a hydrazone was obtained to establish the structure–property relationship and to identify the structure of a switch suitable for pH imaging at the desired range.

Experimental Section

Synthesis

All reagents and starting materials were purchased from commercial vendors and used without further purification. All experiments were conducted in the air unless otherwise noted. Detailed NMR and mass spectrometry (MS) results for the compounds are provided in the Supporting Information.

Procedure 1. Ethyl 2-(pyridin-2-yl)acetate derivatives were synthesized following the literature procedure:36n-BuLi (2.5 M solution in hexanes, 2.05 equiv) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of diisopropylamine (2.10 equiv) in THF at −78 °C under Ar. The resulting solution was warmed for 1 h at room temperature to 0 °C and stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. Then, the solution was transferred to a stirred solution of modified 2-picoline (1.0 equiv) and diethyl carbonate (3.0 equiv) in THF at −78 °C under Ar. The resulting solution was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h, then allowed to warm while stirring to room temperature (30 min), and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Then, 10 mL of a saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl and 50 mL of water were added. The aqueous layer was extracted (3 × 15 mL) with Et2O. The organic layer was combined with the ether extracts, dried with MgSO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure to give the product (yield 70–85%) as a bright yellow oil.

Procedure 2. Hydrazone molecular switches (1a–1g, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, Figure 1) were obtained according to the modified literature procedure.36 Trifluoromethylaniline (1 equiv) was dissolved in a mixture (1:5 ratio) of 38% HCl and anhydrous (99.9%) EtOH and stirred in an ice bath for 30 min. A cold (≈0 °C) aqueous solution of NaNO2 (1 equiv) was then added dropwise over a period of 30 min. The obtained solution of diazonium salt was then added dropwise to a suspension of ethyl 2-pyridylacetate (1 equiv) and sodium acetate (6.4 equiv) in a cooled (0 °C) ethanol/water (8:1) mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then washed with methylene chloride. The organic fraction was washed twice with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and dried over MgSO4. The crude product was then subjected to silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 90:10–60:40 depending on the compound) to give pure products (yield 30–70%).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Synthesis scheme of fluorinated hydrazone molecular switches. Reaction conditions: (i) HNO2, ethanol, HCl(aq.), 0 °C, 1 h; (ii) n-BuLi, DIPA, THF, −90 °C, 3 h; (iii) ethanol/water, AcONa, rt, 12 h.

Procedure 3. 1a/4a was dissolved in ethanol, and a tin(II) chloride/ethanol suspension was added. The mixture was heated at 50 °C for 2 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure, and sodium hydroxide solution was then added. The resulting mixture was steam-distilled. The suspension was extracted with chloroform. The organic layer was dried with MgSO4 and then evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator. The residue was crystallized from Et2O and then recrystallized twice from the same solvent to obtain a red crystalline product (yield = 78%).

Instrumental Measurements

High-resolution-mass spectrometry (HR-MS) was performed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-MS (UPLC-MS) (Waters Xevo G2 QTof, ESI ionization, TOF detection). NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Agilent spectrometer and referenced internally using the residual protonated solvent resonances relative to tetramethyl silane (δ = 0 ppm) or trifluoroacetic acid (19F NMR, δ = −76.5 ppm). Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra were recorded using a JASCO V-650 UV–vis spectrophotometer. A pHenomenal MD 8000L pH meter with a standard glass electrode was used for the pH measurements. A 3 M KCl solution was used as a reference to pH = 7.

Computational Methods

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using a B3LYP hybrid functional combined with a 6–31G (d, p) basis set, CPCM (acetonitrile). All calculations were performed using Orca 4.1.1 software. Statistical calculations were performed in Microsoft Excel.

Switching Measurements

Solutions (5 mM) of molecular switches were prepared in acetonitrile/water (1:1) with the addition of 50 μL of D2O and 10 μL of fluorobenzene as an internal standard. Aqueous solutions of hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, trifluoroacetic acid, and acetic acid of concentrations from 0.5 mM to 1 M were used to induce the switching process, which was monitored by means of 1H, 19F NMR, or UV–vis.

Results and Discussion

Three series of compounds of the general structure presented in Figure 1 were obtained. The −CF3 group was located in the meta position of the phenyl ring. This was due to the higher commercial availability of substituted anilines and the minimal impact of switching on the chemical shift of fluorine. Compounds 1a–1h contained a substituent in the phenyl ring, 2a and 2b in the pyridine ring, while 3a–3b contained substituents in both rings. This allowed the evaluation of the impact of the substitution on the pKa of molecular switches depending on the Hammett constant of the substituents and their positions. Series 1 contained eight different compounds with substituents of ascending electron-donating nature starting with the −NO2 group and ending with the −NH2 group. Series 2 was modified in the pyridine ring by −Cl and −Me groups. Series 3 was modified in both rings yielding substituents with the −Me or −OMe group.

The mechanism of the switching process (Figure 2) is based on the protonation of the pyridine subunit, which forces E/Z isomerization. The process is manifested by changes in the 1H NMR and 19F NMR spectra, and a color change in the solution (usually from orange to yellow, Figure S28). In the case of 19F NMR spectra, peaks of the −CF3 group can be seen near −63.5 ppm before and −63.4 ppm after the addition of an acid. At 1H NMR spectra, the changes are more pronounced with the hydrazone N–H proton visible at 15 ppm replaced with a new signal at 13 ppm. This shift indicates that rotation around the C=N bond has occurred (E/Z isomerization), in addition to the formation of a hydrogen bond by the N–H proton with the carbonyl group of the ester subunit, yielding Z–H+.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hydrazone switching mechanism under the influence of acid and base, with observations of 1H and 19F NMR spectra.

To precisely determine the pKa of molecular switches, titration experiments were performed where the progress of isomerization was monitored by 19F NMR (Figure 3). The ratio of the area under the Z–H+ peak (protonated form) to the sum of the areas under peaks corresponding to E and Z–H+ was used to quantify the progress of the switching process.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

19F NMR titration curves of series 1 (a), 2 (b), and 3 (c). Peak notation as in Figure 2. Sigmoidal curves were fitted to the data using the Microsoft Excel Solver add-in and the least-squares method.

The pKa of each switch was calculated from regression data assuming pKa = pH, where [Z–H+]/([Z–H+]+[E]) = 0.5. The results were plotted against the sum of R1 and R2 Hammett substituent constants introduced to aniline and pyridine rings (Figure 4). The relationship was linear with only minor differences among series 1–3. If each series was considered separately, the slopes were higher if substituents were introduced to the pyridyl ring (−4.6 and −4.2 for series 2 and 3 respectively, not statistically different) than series 1 (−3.2), where only the aniline ring was substituted (Figure S27).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship between substituents’ Hammett constants and the pKa of hydrazone switches in series 1–3. The dashed lines represents the confidence interval of linear regression at α = 0.05.

The observed relationship and apparent differences among series 1–3 can be explained by the effect of substitution of pyridyl and phenyl rings on the basicity of pyridyl nitrogen. In both cases, the partial negative charge on the pyridyl nitrogen increases with the electron-donating strength of the substituents (regardless of their position), due to possible resonance between both rings through the HN–N=C–C=N fragment. The effect can be quantified with DFT calculations, showing that the negative charge on the pyridyl nitrogen increases with the donor strength of the substituent.43,45,46 If the substituent is positioned in the pyridine ring, the charge changes more rapidly with the substituent’s Hammett constant than that with substitution of phenyl or both rings. The effect is evident from the respective slopes of linear regression lines 0.005 (green) versus −0.0024 (red) and 0.0019 (blue; Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

DFT-calculated partial negative charge of pyridyl nitrogen in hydrazone switches depending on the position and Hammett constant of the substituents.

Additionally, we assessed the effect of field-inductive (σF) and resonance (σR) constants of the substituents on the pKa of the switches.47 For series 1, the resonance effect was 60% stronger than the inductive effect (pKa= −4.5σR −2.8σF +3.3), while for series 2, both effects were comparable (pKa= −4.0σR −3.5σF +3.6).

Based on the general relationship between the substituent effect and the pKa of hydrazones (Figure 4), we attempted to obtain a switch of pKa > 6 suitable for the 19F MRI of tumors. Based on the slope and the intercept, the sum of the Hammett constant should be at least −0.59. Considering the commercial availability of the reagents, a hydrazone switch with the −NH2 group in phenyl and the −CH3 group in the pyridine ring 4b was obtained. Additionally, we decided to change the position of the −CF3 group from para to ortho to increase the difference in chemical shifts between the E and Z–H+ states. Such a change should have minimal effect on the pKa of the resulting switch because of only 0.1 differences in Hammett constants of o-CF3 and p-CF3 groups and nearly identical pKa of CF3-substituted hydrazone switches regardless of the position of the −CF3 group.36

The synthetic procedure was identical for compound 1h (procedure 3) with only 1a replaced by 4a. The resulting switch 4b was soluble in water. The switching process took place at pH from 5.5 to 6.4 with a calculated pKa of 6.05 (Figure 6). We observed no signs of degradation of the probe even after 1 week at pH < 3. The titration of 4b with 0.05 mM acetic acid in aqueous solution showed a 1.8 ppm difference in the chemical shift between E and Z–H+ isomers at the 19F NMR spectrum (Figure 6). The corresponding peak widths at half height were 9 Hz in both cases. This difference facilitates the potential use of 4b in 19F MRI, as a 0.5 ppm difference can be considered minimal to allow a short acquisition time.36 No changes in transverse and longitudinal relaxation times (T1T2 ≈ 1.6 s) were observed, indicating the lack of aggregation of the switch. For comparison, the properties of the molecular switch bearing no substituents and a CF3 group in the ortho position were as follows: peak widths at half height = 8 Hz, relaxation times ≈ 1.6 s, and Δδ = 1.8 ppm (Table S4). This compound was successfully used in 19F MRI phantom experiments36 performed in a 30/70 water/acetonitrile solution. The NMR properties of 4b in purely aqueous solution were nearly identical. This indicates that the 19F NMR findings for 4b have the potential to translate well to 19F MRI.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Titration of 4b in water by 0.05 mM acetic acid followed by 19F NMR.

Conclusions

We have successfully obtained a series of hydrazone molecular switches with the −CF3 group for monitoring changes in pH via 19F NMR. A general relationship between Hammett constants of the substituents on the pKa of the switches was established and allowed us to design a switch suitable for the 19F MRI of the pH gradient in a physiologically relevant range of 5.5–7. The results can be used in the design of hydrazone-based switches of any desired pKa for various purposes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Silesian University of Technology for the financial support (Grant 04/050/BKM22/0146)

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssensors.2c02251.

  • Chemicals and reagents; measurements; sample preparation; additional experimental details; materials; and methods (PDF)

Author Contributions

D.J.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing of original draft, visualization, and editing. P.I.: investigation. T.K.: conceptualization, resources, writing of the original draft, and review and editing.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

se2c02251_si_001.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Neina D. The Role of Soil pH in Plant Nutrition and Soil Remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–9. 10.1155/2019/5794869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo Q.; Hossen A.; Sameen D. E.; Ahmed S.; Dai J.; Li S.; Qin W.; Liu Y. Recent Advances in the Fabrication of pH-Sensitive Indicators Films and Their Application for Food Quality Evaluation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 1–17. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1959296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Richter A.; Paschew G.; Klatt S.; Lienig J.; Arndt K.-F.; Adler H.-J. Review on Hydrogel-Based pH Sensors and Microsensors. Sensors 2008, 8, 561–581. 10.3390/s8010561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Briggs E. M.; Sandoval S.; Erten A.; Takeshita Y.; Kummel A. C.; Martz T. R. Solid State Sensor for Simultaneous Measurement of Total Alkalinity and pH of Seawater. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 1302–1309. 10.1021/acssensors.7b00305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuo S.-H.; Shen C.-J.; Shen C.-F.; Cheng C.-M. Role of pH Value in Clinically Relevant Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 107 10.3390/diagnostics10020107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Orouji A.; Abbasi-Moayed S.; Ghasemi F.; Hormozi-Nezhad M. R. A Wide-Range pH Indicator Based on Colorimetric Patterns of Gold@silver Nanorods. Sens. Actuators, B 2022, 358, 131479 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131479. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aref M.; Ranjbari E.; García-Guzmán J. J.; Hu K.; Lork A.; Crespo G. A.; Ewing A. G.; Cuartero M. Potentiometric pH Nanosensor for Intracellular Measurements: Real-Time and Continuous Assessment of Local Gradients. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 15744–15751. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anemone A.; Consolino L.; Arena F.; Capozza M.; Longo D. L. Imaging Tumor Acidosis: A Survey of the Available Techniques for Mapping in Vivo Tumor pH. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019, 38, 25–49. 10.1007/s10555-019-09782-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Janasik D.; Krawczyk T. 19F MRI Probes for Multimodal Imaging. Chem. - Eur. J. 2021, 28, e202102556 10.1002/chem.202102556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao J.; Chen J.; Ma S.; Liu Q.; Huang L.; Chen X.; Lou K.; Wang W. Recent Developments in Multimodality Fluorescence Imaging Probes. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 320–338. 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. James M. L.; Gambhir S. S. A Molecular Imaging Primer: Modalities, Imaging Agents, and Applications. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 897–965. 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pierre V. C.; Allen M. J.; Caravan P. Contrast Agents for MRI: 30+ Years and Where Are We Going?. JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 19, 127–131. 10.1007/s00775-013-1074-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wahsner J.; Gale E. M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez A.; Caravan P. Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 957–1057. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tirotta I.; Dichiarante V.; Pigliacelli C.; Cavallo G.; Terraneo G.; Bombelli F. B.; Metrangolo P.; Resnati G. 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): From Design of Materials to Clinical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1106–1129. 10.1021/cr500286d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolters M.; Mohades S. G.; Hackeng T. M.; Post M. J.; Kooi M. E.; Backes W. H. Clinical Perspectives of Hybrid Proton-Fluorine Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy. Invest. Radiol. 2013, 48, 341–350. 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318277528c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xie D.; Yu M.; Kadakia R. T.; Que E. L. 19F Magnetic Resonance Activity-Based Sensing Using Paramagnetic Metals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 2–10. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Blahut J.; Benda L.; Kotek J.; Pintacuda G.; Hermann P. Paramagnetic Cobalt(II) Complexes with Cyclam Derivatives: Toward 19F MRI Contrast Agents. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 10071–10082. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chalmers K.; DeâLuca E.; Hogg N. H. M.; Kenwright A.; Kuprov I.; Parker D.; Botta M.; Wilson J. I.; Blamire A. Design Principles and Theory of Paramagnetic Fluorine-Labelled Lanthanide Complexes as Probes for 19F Magnetic Resonance: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 134–148. 10.1002/chem.200902300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu J.-X. X.; Hallac R. R.; Chiguru S.; Mason R. P. New Frontiers and Developing Applications in 19F NMR. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2013, 70, 25–49. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Carril M. Activatable Probes for Diagnosis and Biomarker Detection by MRI. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4332–4347. 10.1039/C7TB00093F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizukami S. Development of Molecular Imaging Tools to Investigate Protein Functions by Chemical Probe Design. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 59, 1435–1446. 10.1248/cpb.59.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peterson K. L.; Srivastava K.; Pierre V. C. Fluorinated Paramagnetic Complexes: Sensitive and Responsive Probes for Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 160 10.3389/fchem.2018.00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kodibagkar V. D.; Yu J.; Liu L.; Hetherington H. P.; Mason R. P. Imaging β-Galactosidase Activity Using 19F Chemical Shift Imaging of LacZ Gene-Reporter Molecule 2-Fluoro-4-Nitrophenol-β-d-Galactopyranoside. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 24, 959–962. 10.1016/j.mri.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harvey P.; Chalmers K. H.; De Luca E.; Mishra A.; Parker D. Paramagnetic 19F Chemical Shift Probes That Respond Selectively to Calcium or Citrate Levels and Signal Ester Hydrolysis. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 8748–8757. 10.1002/chem.201200737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Basal L. A.; Bailey M. D.; Romero J.; Ali M. M.; Kurenbekova L.; Yustein J.; Pautler R. G.; Allen M. J. Fluorinated Eu II -Based Multimodal Contrast Agent for Temperature- and Redox-Responsive Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 8345–8350. 10.1039/C7SC03142D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang Z.; Su M.-Y.; Nalcioglu O. Applications of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Oncology: Measurement of Tumor Oxygen Tension. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2002, 1, 29–38. 10.1177/153303460200100104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cho M. H.; Shin S. H.; Park S. H.; Kadayakkara D. K.; Kim D.; Choi Y. Targeted, Stimuli-Responsive, and Theranostic 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging Probes. Bioconjugate Chem. 2019, 30, 2502–2518. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tannock I. F.; Rotin D. Acid pH in Tumors and Its Potential for Therapeutic Exploitation. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 4373–4384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hao G.; Xu Z. P.; Li L. Manipulating Extracellular Tumour pH: An Effective Target for Cancer Therapy. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 22182–22192. 10.1039/C8RA02095G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oishi M.; Sumitani S.; Nagasaki Y. On–Off Regulation of 19F Magnetic Resonance Signals Based on pH-Sensitive PEGylated Nanogels for Potential Tumor-Specific Smart 19F MRI Probes. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 1379–1382. 10.1021/bc7002154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu J.-X.; Cui W.; Bourke V. A.; Mason R. P. 6-Trifluoromethylpyridoxine: Novel 19F NMR pH Indicator for in Vivo Detection. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6814–6821. 10.1021/jm300520q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen S.; Yang Y.; Li H.; Zhou X.; Liu M. pH-Triggered Au-Fluorescent Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for 19F MR/Fluorescent Multimodal Cancer Cellular Imaging. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 283–285. 10.1039/C3CC47324D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang X.; Huang G.; Zhang S.; Sagiyama K.; Togao O.; Ma X.; Wang Y.; Li Y.; Soesbe T. C.; Sumer B. D.; Takahashi M.; Sherry A. D.; Gao J. Multi-Chromatic pH-Activatable 19F-MRI Nanoprobes with Binary ON/OFF pH Transitions and Chemical-Shift Barcodes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8074–8078. 10.1002/anie.201301135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Y.; Zhang H.; Guo C.; Hu G.; Wang L. Multiresponsive Nanoprobes for Turn-On Fluorescence/ 19F MRI Dual-Modal Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 11739–11746. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zalewski M.; Janasik D.; Kapała A.; Minoshima M.; Sugihara F.; Raj W.; Pietrasik J.; Kikuchi K.; Krawczyk T. pH-Sensitive Polymethacrylates as Potential Contrast Agents in 19F MRI. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2022, 223, 2200027 10.1002/macp.202200027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Janasik D.; Jasiński K.; Węglarz W. P.; Nemec I.; Jewula P.; Krawczyk T. Ratiometric pH-Responsive 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents Based on Hydrazone Switches. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 3427–3431. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Aprahamian I. Hydrazone Switches and Things in Between. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6674–6684. 10.1039/C7CC02879B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Feringa B. L.; Browne W. R.. Molecular Switches; WileyVCH, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang J. L.; Zhong J. Q.; Lin J. D.; Hu W. P.; Wu K.; Xu G. Q.; Wee A. T. S.; Chen W. Towards Single Molecule Switches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2998–3022. 10.1039/C4CS00377B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dattler D.; Fuks G.; Heiser J.; Moulin E.; Perrot A.; Yao X.; Giuseppone N. Design of Collective Motions from Synthetic Molecular Switches, Rotors, and Motors. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 310–433. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Landge S. M.; Aprahamian I. A pH Activated Configurational Rotary Switch: Controlling the E/Z Isomerization in Hydrazones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18269–18271. 10.1021/ja909149z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bornhorst G. M.; Rutherfurd S. M.; Roman M. J.; Burri B. J.; Moughan P. J.; Singh R. P. Gastric pH Distribution and Mixing of Soft and Rigid Food Particles in the Stomach Using a Dual-Marker Technique. Food Biophys. 2014, 9, 292–300. 10.1007/s11483-014-9354-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Su X.; Lõkov M.; Kütt A.; Leito I.; Aprahamian I. Unusual Para-Substituent Effects on the Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bond in Hydrazone-Based Switches. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10490 10.1039/c2cc35860c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Paskaleva V.; Dobrev S.; Kochev N.; Angelova S.; Antonov L. Unusual Para-Substituent Effects on the Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond in Hydrazone-Based Switches: Insights from Chemical Landscape Analysis and DFT Calculations. Physchem 2021, 1, 189–201. 10.3390/physchem1020013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Andon R. J. L.; Cox J. D.; Herington E. F. G. The Ultra-Violet Absorption Spectra and Dissociation Constants of Certain Pyridine Bases in Aqueous Solution. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1954, 50, 918–927. 10.1039/tf9545000918. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jiang W.; Lumata L.; Chen W.; Zhang S.; Kovacs Z.; Sherry A. D.; Khemtong C. Hyperpolarized 15N-Pyridine Derivatives as pH-Sensitive MRI Agents. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9104 10.1038/srep09104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hansch C.; Leo A.; Taft R. W. A Survey of Hammett Substituent Constants and Resonance and Field Parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. 10.1021/cr00002a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

se2c02251_si_001.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Sensors are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES