Table 1.

Top 15 TF binding probabilities in glioma enhancers calculated by the hypergeometric test

TF model	Occurrences in enhancers	Occurrences in the genome	Hypergeometric test (p value)	Hypergeometric test (adj. p value)	Consensus logo
FOSL1_0_A	128	597	1,20723E−42	7,58142E−40
FOSL2_0_A	137	726	4,86818E−39	1,52861E−36
JUNB_0_A	115	544	7,50317E−38	1,57066E−35
JUND_0_A	123	623	3,12176E−37	4,90116E−35
FOS_0_A	119	626	1,9905E−34	2,50007E−32
BACH2_0_A	67	273	1,21946E−26	1,27636E−24
JUN_0_A	94	524	1,38731E−25	1,24462E−23
NFE2_0_A	71	344	2,45514E−23	1,92728E−21
BACH1_0_A	87	494	3,08603E−23	2,15336E−21
FOSB_0_A	96	585	3,7038E−23	2,32598E−21
NF2L2_0_A	63	279	4,66643E−23	2,66411E−21
MAFB_0_B	33	147	9,6426E−13	5,04629E−11
ZN554_1_D	48	302	7,42587E−12	3,58726E−10
MAFF_1_B	30	134	1,0909E−11	4,89348E−10
MAFK_0_A	16	41	8,72968E−11	3,65483E−09

Obtained p values were corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg method