Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;97(2):e01655-22. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01655-22

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Effect of in vitro SIRT2 inhibition on HIV replication. (A to C) Inhibition of HIV replication in the presence of SIRT2 inhibitor (AK-1), tested in HIV-infected PHA blasts (seven independent experiments) (A and B) with HIVNL4-3 strain, at day 3 and 1 week postinfection, respectively, and HIV-infected monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) (six independent experiments) (C) infected with HIVBaL strain at day 4 postinfection. (D to F) Cell viability in the presence of SIRT2 inhibitor (AK-1), tested in HIV-infected PHA blasts (seven independent experiments) (D and E) with HIVNL4-3 strain, at day 3 and 1 week, respectively, and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) (six independent experiments) (F) infected with HIVBaL strain at day 4 postinfection. Experimental conditions are shown on the x axis; quantification of viability (% live cells) is shown on the y axis. (G) Glial cells infected with the HIVNLAD8 virus strain (MOI, 0.01) in the presence of different doses of AK-1 inhibitor. Experimental conditions are shown on the x axis; quantification of absolute p24 supernatant (pg/mL) is shown on the y axis. The data presented correspond to the mean of two duplicates performed in a single experiment. (H) HIV-infected microglial cells (six independent experiments) with the NLAD8 virus strain in the presence of different doses of AK-1 inhibitor. Experimental conditions are shown on the x axis; quantification of p24 levels (pg/mL) is shown on the y axis. For results from HIV-infected PHA blasts, MDMs, and primary glial cells, ANOVA test for multiple comparisons corrected by original FDR method of Benjamini and Hochberg was used to analyzed differences between conditions. For all comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered significant. The plots show the median of all experiments for each condition.