Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):610–616. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2038

Table 3.

Overall risk of bias

S. no. Domain Abdlemotleb et al. (2021) Aldayari et al. (2019) Masuda et al. (2011)
1 A clearly stated aim 2 2 0
2 Inclusion of consecutive patients 2 2 0
3 Prospective collection of data 2 2 2
4 Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study 2 2 0
5 Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint 0 0 0
6 Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study 2 2 2
7 Loss to follow-up <5% 2 2 2
8 Prospective calculation of the study size 2 2 0
Additional criteria for comparative study
9 An adequate control group 2
10 Contemporary groups 2
11 Baseline equivalence of groups 2
12 Adequate statistical analysis 2
Total score 22/24 14/16 6/16