Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;2022:8225273. doi: 10.1155/2022/8225273

Table 4.

Growth performance of the juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei fed with different diets.

Index FBW WGR Survival SGR FE
CD 7.55 ± 0.13c 153.86 ± 6.69c 97.78 ± 1.11 2.33 ± 0.07c 1.72 ± 0.03ab
BSFLM 5.05 ± 0.02a 66.50 ± 2.18a 96.66 ± 3.33 1.27 ± 0.03a 2.83 ± 0.35c
CM 7.60 ± 0.10c 151.48 ± 3.34c 96.67 ± 0.00 2.31 ± 0.03c 1.73 ± 0.01ab
CPC 7.49 ± 0.05c 148.16 ± 4.90c 98.89 ± 1.11 2.27 ± 0.05c 1.72 ± 0.02ab
TM 6.35 ± 0.17b 105.54 ± 6.62b 96.66 ± 3.33 1.80 ± 0.08b 2.49 ± 0.02bc
CAP 7.81 ± 0.07c 155.52 ± 3.32c 93.33 ± 3.33 2.34 ± 0.03c 1.47 ± 0.12a
BPM 6.45 ± 0.08b 112.97 ± 3.24b 95.55 ± 2.93 1.89 ± 0.04b 2.11 ± 0.18abc

Data represent mean ± SEM of three replicates (n = 3). Values in the same line with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Duncan's test. The lack of superscript letter indicates no significant differences among groups. FBW: final body weight (g); WGR: weight gain rate (%); SGR: specific growth rate (% day−1); FE: feed efficiency; CD: control diet; BSFLM: black soldier fly larvae meal; CM: Chlorella vulgaris meal; CPC: cottonseed protein concentrate; TM: Tenebrio molitor meal; CAP: Clostridium autoethanogenum protein; BPM: methanotroph bacterial meal.