Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):e028562. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028562

Table 2.

Intervention Visit and Postintervention Outcome

Usual Care (N=506) Tool Intervention (N=495) P value
Duration of patient visit, n (%) 0.33
0–10 min 61 (12.1) 43 (8.7)
11–20 min 188 (37.2) 209 (42.2)
21–30 min 128 (25.3) 89 (18.0)
31–60 min 106 (20.9) 135 (27.3)
>60 min 19 (3.8) 17 (3.4)
Missing 4 (0.8) 2 (0.4)
Duration of explanation/discussion of anticoagulation during visit, n (%) 0.015
Did not explain/discuss 2 (0.4) 2 (0.4)
0–10 min 345 (68.2) 300 (60.6)
11–20 min 125 (24.7) 160 (32.3)
21–30 min 17 (3.4) 15 (3.0)
31–60 min 10 (2.0) 13 (2.6)
>60 min 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6)
Missing 4 (0.8) 2 (0.4)
Clinician reported decision of anticoagulation medication, n (%) 0.77
Warfarin (Coumadin) 33 (6.5) 26 (5.3)
Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban 439 (86.8) 432 (87.3)
To not take a blood thinner medication 16 (3.2) 19 (3.8)
To start taking aspirin or other antiplatelet agent for the purpose of stroke prevention 6 (1.2) 4 (0.8)
The decision about anticoagulation medication was not made today 9 (1.8) 12 (2.4)
Missing 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4)
Patient reported decision of anticoagulation medication, n (%) 0.37
Warfarin (Coumadin) 35 (6.9) 24 (4.8)
Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban 434 (85.8) 433 (87.5)
To not take a blood thinner medication 16 (3.2) 20 (4.0)
To start taking aspirin or other antiplatelet agent for the purpose of stroke prevention 9 (1.8) 4 (0.8)
The decision about anticoagulation medication was not made today 9 (1.8) 10 (2.0)
Missing 3 (0.6) 4 (0.8)
Agreement between patient and clinician reported decision, n (%) 0.78
Yes 483 (95.5) 475 (96.0)
No 19 (3.8) 15 (3.0)
Missing 4 (0.8) 5 (1.0)
Quality of communication—did clinician explain things,* n (%) 0.069
Yes, definitely 475 (93.9) 475 (96.0)
Yes, somewhat 23 (4.5) 14 (2.8)
No 4 (0.8) 1 (0.2)
Missing 4 (0.8) 5 (1.0)
Quality of communication—did clinician listen carefully, n (%) 0.004
Yes, definitely 474 (93.7) 480 (97.0)
Yes, somewhat 24 (4.7) 9 (1.8)
No 4 (0.8) 1 (0.2)
Missing 4 (0.8) 5 (1.0)
Quality of communication—did the clinician show respect, n (%) 0.24
Yes, definitely 487 (96.2) 481 (97.2)
Yes, somewhat 14 (2.8) 7 (1.4)
No 1 (0.2) 2 (0.4)
Missing 4 (0.8) 5 (1.0)
DCS 0.0001
n (%) 502 (99) 489 (99)
Median (min, max) 12.5 (0.0, 76.6) 6.2 (0.0, 54.7)
DRS 0.016
n (%) 503 (99) 490 (99)
Median (min, max) 10.0 (0, 65.0) 5.0 (0, 60.0)
DCS and DRS composite end point 0.0001
Preparation for decision making <0.0001
n (%) 503 (99) 490 (99)
Median (min, max) 70.0 (0, 100) 82.5 (0, 100)
AF knowledge <0.0001
n (%) 502 (99) 490 (99)
Median (min, max) 6.0 (2.00, 8.00) 7.0 (2.00, 8.00)

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; DCS, Decision Conflict Scale; and DRS, Decision Regret Scale.

*

Did the clinician explain things in a way that was easy to understand?

Did the clinician show respect for what patient had to say?