Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):413–432. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2022.129024

Table 3.

Ethanol, CS, and interactive effects on spatial learning.

Ethanol Effect CS Effect ETOH × CS Interaction
F Ratio P value F Ratio P value F Ratio P value
Latency (AUC)-Day 1 0.074 ns 0.198 ns 2.677 ns
Latency (AUC)-Day 2 0.021 ns 2.303 ns 0.233 ns
Latency (AUC)-Day 3 9.34 0.005 1.87 ns 4.22 0.049
Latency (AUC)-Day 4 1.180 ns 0.257 ns 0.125 ns

Two-Way ANOVA results from comparing mean levels of the latencies (determined by the area under the curve analysis of three daily trials) to locate the platform. Significant differences are highlighted with bold font. Corresponding data with Tukey post-hoc significance test outcomes are graphed in Figures 2(a)-(d).