Table 4.
Quality assessment
| Quantitative randomised Cross-over |
Quantitative non-randomised | Quantitative descriptive | Quality | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | |
| Mileman 2002 | * | * | * | - | - | medium | ||||||||||
| Diniz 2010 | - | * | * | - | * | medium | ||||||||||
| Lazarchik 1995 | - | * | * | - | * | medium | ||||||||||
| Castner 2020 | - | * | * | - | * | medium | ||||||||||
| Vizzotto 2015 | - | - | * | - | * | low | ||||||||||
| Bussaneli 2015 | - | * | * | Can't tell | * | medium | ||||||||||
| Plessas 2019 | * | * | * | - | Can’t tell | medium | ||||||||||
| Milgrom 1975 | * | * | Can't tell | * | - | medium | ||||||||||
1*meets 20% of MMAT criteria
2**meets 40% of MMAT criteria
3***meets 60% of MMAT criteria
4****meets 80% of MMAT criteria
5*****meets 100%of MMAT criteria
20-40%=low quality; 60–80% = medium quality; 80–100% = high quality