Table 3:

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Artificially Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Urinary incontinence

		Artificially Sweetened Beverage
		Never or <1/week	1–6/week	1 or more/day
Urinary Incontinence	N	51,480	18,414	10,494
	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	ref	1.01 (0.97–1.06)	1.04 (0.98–1.11)
Type of incontinence
Urge	N	14,061	5,143	2,763
	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	ref	1.05 (1.00–1.11)	1.05 (0.98–1.13)
Stress	N	13,835	5,077	2,964
	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	ref	0.99 (0.94–1.05)	1.02 (0.95–1.09)
Mixed	N	7,096	2,755	1,699
	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	ref	1.02 (0.96–1.09)	1.10 (1.01–1.19)
Unknown	N	3,124	987	565
	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	ref	0.90 (0.82–0.98)	0.98 (0.87–1.10)

Type of incontinence compared to No urinary incontinence in polytomous logistic regression. The model adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, NSES (neighborhood socioeconomic status), smoking, alcohol, caffeine, # live births, diuretic use, diabetes, water consumption, BMI, Hormone Therapy use, physical activity, diet quality (HEI). Cases with incomplete data were not included in adjusted models (N=64,464)