TABLE 4.
Adjusted hazards ratios for anticholinergic drug use on developing dementia#
| Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value |
| Age | 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) | <0.001 | 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) | <0.001 | 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) | 0.799 | 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) | 0.846 | 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) | 0.812 |
|
| ||||||
| Education | ||||||
| < high school | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| = high school | 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) | 0.126 | 0.7 (0.5, 1.1) | 0.137 | 0.7 (0.5, 1.1) | 0.130 |
| > high school | 0.6 (0.4, 1.0) | 0.040 | 0.6 (0.4, 1.0) | 0.042 | 0.6 (0.4, 1.0) | 0.041 |
|
| ||||||
| Total number of prescription medications | ||||||
| <3 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| 3-6 | 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) | 0.563 | 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) | 0.524 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) | 0.515 |
| >6 | 0.9 (0.6, 1.6) | 0.824 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.5) | 0.647 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.6) | 0.641 |
|
| ||||||
| Take any anticholinergic drug | 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) | 0.641 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Total ACR score | ||||||
| 0 | Reference | |||||
| 1-3 | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) | 0.516 | ||||
| >3 | 1.1 (0.6, 1.9) | 0.825 | ||||
| >3 versus 1-3 # | 1.2 (0.8, 1.9) | 0.340 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Total number of anticholinergic drugs | ||||||
| 0 | Reference | |||||
| 1-2 | 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) | 0.573 | ||||
| >2 | 1.0 (0.6, 1.9) | 0.915 | ||||
| >2 versus 1-2 * | 1.2 (0.7, 1.9) | 0.498 | ||||
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Dementia was defined as clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥1.
is comparing total ACR score of >3 to 1-3 (the reference)
is comparing total number of anticholinergic drugs of >2 to 1-2 (the reference).
Models 4, 5, 6 used any anticholinergic drug use, total ACR score, total number of anticholinergic drugs as the main predictor, respectively.