Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;4(2):100914. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100914

Table 3.

Performance statistics of the five MSI classification models and two feature extractors for comparative analysis and WiseMSI on TSMCC cohort

Model Specificity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
EfficientNet 0.973 (0.920, 1.026) 0.3603 (0.071, 0,650) 0.9050 (0.865, 0.946)
ViT 0.978 (0.966, 0.990) 0.7431 (0.681, 0.806) 0.9385 (0.928, 0.949)
MIL 0.9698 (0.950, 0.990) 0.6680 (0.635, 0.701) 0.9073 (0.884, 0.931)
AttMIL 0.9950 (0.989, 1.001) 0.6318 (0.579, 0.685) 0.8993 (0.872, 0.927)
VarMIL 0.992 (0.983, 1.000) 0.624 (0.577, 0.671) 0.903 (0.890, 0.915)
WiseMSI (Moco V2 version) 0.926 (0.871, 0.980) 0.793 (0.723, 0.863) 0.937 (0.920, 0.95)
WiseMSI (ImageNet version) 0.947 (0.937, 0.957) 0.847 (0.826, 0.869) 0.954 (0.948, 0.968)

Performance is reported on WSI level and 95% confidence level (CI) is calculated based on 5-fold cross-validation for EfficientNet, Vit, MIL, and AttMIL, and 10-fold cross-validation of WiseMSI.