Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2022 Sep 1;23(4):937–948. doi: 10.1037/emo0001137

Table 3.

Affective well-being levels as a function of positive and negative nostalgia (Studies 3 – 4)

Conditions Pairwise Comparisons
Positive Nostalgia (N = 144) Negative Nostalgia (N = 146) Control (N = 155) Omnibus Test Positive vs. negative Positive vs. control Negative vs. control

DV α M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) F p ηp2 Difference [95%CI] p Difference [95%CI] p Difference [95%CI] p
PA .74 3.88 (1.28) 3.49 (1.29) 3.47 (1.33) 4.60 .011 .020 .39 [.09, .69] .011 .41 [.11, .70] .007 .02 [−.28, .31] .901
PD .87 4.49 (1.31) 3.95 (1.36) 4.14 (1.35) 6.01 .003 .026 .54 [.23, .85] < .001 .35 [.04, .65] .025 −.19 [−.49, .11] .219
NA .88 2.97 (1.61) 3.57 (1.74) 3.58 (1.65) 6.44 .002 .028 −.60 [−.99, −.22] .002 −.61 [−.99, −.23] .002 −.01 [−.39, .37] .949
ND .78 2.99 (1.45) 3.41 (1.50) 2.70 (1.44) 9.10 < .001 .040 −.43 [−.76, −.09] .014 .29 [−.04, .63] .085 .72 [.39, 1.05] < .001

Note: PA = positive activated affect, PD = positive deactivated affect, NA = negative activated affect, ND = negative deactivated affect. Significance tests of difference scores were calculated with Fisher’s LSD.