Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 28;20(1):40–50. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.01.002

Table 2. Diagnostic Performance of SF-FFR versus CFD-FFR for Demonstration of Ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80).

Method TP TN FP FN Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
FN: false negative; FP: false positive; NPV: negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value; TN: true negative; TP: true positive.
Patient level SF-FFR 34 24 2 4 0.89 (0.81,0.97) 0.92 (0.82,1.00) 0.94 (0.88,1.00) 0.86 (0.75,0.96) 0.91 (0.84,0.97)
CFD-FFR 32 23 3 6 0.84 (0.74,0.94) 0.88 (0.77,0.97) 0.91 (0.83,0.97) 0.79 (0.66,0.92) 0.86 (0.78,0.92)
P-value 0.731 0.995 0.552
Vessel level SF-FFR 39 28 4 4 0.91 (0.83-0.98) 0.88 (0.78-0.97) 0.91 (0.83-0.98) 0.88 (0.78-0.97) 0.89 (0.84-0.94)
CFD-FFR 36 29 3 7 0.84 (0.74-0.93) 0.91 (0.81-0.98) 0.92 (0.85-0.98) 0.81 (0.69-0.91) 0.87 (0.80-0.93)
P-value 0.344 0.999 0.603