Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 28;329(8):651–661. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0713

Table 2. Change in Ambulatory, Home, and Office Blood Pressure Levels at 2 Months Compared With Baseline.

Observed data Baseline-adjusted for observed data Baseline-adjusted with multiple imputations for missing data Median between-group difference (95% CI)c
Ultrasound renal denervation, mean (SD) Sham procedure, mean (SD)
At baseline At 2 mo Difference At baseline At 2 mo Difference Mean between-group difference (95% CI)a P valueb Mean between-group difference (95% CI)a P valueb
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg
Daytime ambulatoryd 150.2 (8.6) 142.3 (13.4) −7.9 (11.6) 151.3 (9.0) 149.5 (11.1) −1.8 (9.5) −6.3 (−9.4 to −3.2) <.001 −6.3 (−9.3 to −3.2) <.001 −7.0 (−9.0 to −4.0)e
24-h ambulatoryf 143.2 (9.0) 135.6 (13.0) −7.7 (10.7) 144.5 (9.7) 142.9 (10.5) −1.7 (9.3) −6.3 (−9.2 to −3.4) <.001 −6.2 (−9.1 to −3.4) <.001
Nighttime ambulatoryf 132.1 (12.6) 125.5 (15.0) −6.6 (12.8) 133.8 (13.3) 132.4 (12.2) −1.3 (11.3) −5.9 (−9.1 to −2.6) <.001 −5.8 (−9.0 to −2.6) <.001 −6.0 (−9.0 to −3.0)e
Homeg 152.4 (9.5) 143.4 (12.3) −9.0 (9.5) 149.7 (10.3) 148.8 (12.3) −0.9 (7.9) −7.8 (−10.4 to −5.1) <.001 −7.6 (−10.1 to −5.0) <.001
Officeh 156.8 (13.3) 145.8 (15.9) −11.0 (13.5) 156.7 (12.9) 151.2 (16.4) −5.5 (12.9) −5.5 (−9.2 to −1.8) .004 −5.4 (−9.0 to −1.8) .004
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg
Daytime ambulatoryd 93.8 (5.2) 88.4 (7.4) −5.4 (6.5) 93.2 (5.6) 91.8 (6.7) −1.3 (5.7) −3.9 (−5.6 to −2.2) <.001 −3.9 (−5.6 to −2.2) <.001
24-h ambulatoryf 88.4 (5.8) 83.1 (7.6) −5.3 (6.4) 88.2 (5.8) 87.0 (6.3) −1.2 (5.4) −4.1 (−5.7 to −2.4) <.001 −4.1 (−5.7 to −2.4) <.001
Nighttime ambulatoryf 79.8 (8.3) 75.1 (9.7) −4.7 (8.2) 80.2 (8.0) 79.6 (7.5) −0.5 (6.7) −4.3 (−6.3 to −2.2) <.001 −4.2 (−6.3 to −2.2) <.001 −5.0 (−7.0 to −3.0)e
Homeg 97.8 (6.3) 92.7 (7.4) −5.1 (6.0) 95.7 (7.6) 95.5 (8.1) −0.3 (4.5) −4.4 (−6.0 to −2.9) <.001 −4.3 (−5.9 to −2.8) <.001
Officeh 101.9 (7.8) 96.0 (10.2) −5.9 (9.4) 101.4 (7.5) 98.1 (11.2) −3.3 (9.2) −2.4 (−5.1 to 0.2) .07 −2.3 (−4.9 to 0.2) .08
a

Estimate of treatment difference used baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance.

b

Calculated using baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance.

c

Data provided because change from baseline in either cohort was not normal. These data were calculated using the Hodges-Lehmann estimator of location shift without adjustment for baseline data or multiple imputations.

d

There were 145 patients in the ultrasound renal denervation group and 73 patients in the sham procedure group with data.

e

The P value comparison for these data yielded a value of P<.001 and was calculated using baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance based on ranks and using observed data without multiple imputations.

f

There were 144 patients in the ultrasound renal denervation group and 72 patients in the sham procedure group with data.

g

There were 140 patients in the ultrasound renal denervation group and 69 patients in the sham procedure group with data.

h

There were 137 patients in the ultrasound renal denervation group and 71 patients in the sham procedure group with data.