Table 4.

Associations between ethnic group and treatment receipt among those assessed with the use of logistic regression analysis

	Treatment received (among those assessed)		Unadjusted		Adjusted for age, gender and year of referral		Adjusted for age, gender, year of referral and borough
Complete cases	n	%	OR	CI	OR	CI	OR	CI
Ethnicity
White British	19 995	72.4	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00
Black Caribbean	3975	66.8	0.77	0.72–0.81	0.76	0.72–0.81	0.72	0.68–0.77
Black African	1605	66.1	0.74	0.68–0.81	0.73	0.67–0.80	0.67	0.61–0.73
Black Other	683	64.8	0.70	0.62–0.80	0.63	0.55–0.72	0.65	0.57–0.75
Asian	2514	66.6	0.76	0.71–0.82	0.78	0.72–0.84	0.81	0.75–0.87
Mixed	4582	73.1	1.04	0.97–1.10	1.00	0.94–1.07	0.93	0.88–1.00
White Other	2078	67.5	0.79	0.73–0.86	0.81	0.75–0.88	0.80	0.74–0.87
Other	800	67.5	0.79	0.70–0.90	0.76	0.67–0.86	0.77	0.68–0.88
Weighted MI
Ethnicity
White British	–	72.4	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00	1.00	1.00–1.00
Black Caribbean	–	66.8	0.77	0.72–0.81	0.76	0.72–0.81	0.72	0.68–0.77
Black African	–	67.7	0.80	0.74–0.86	0.78	0.72–0.84	0.77	0.71–0.84
Black Other	–	65.7	0.73	0.65–0.82	0.67	0.59–0.75	0.73	0.64–0.83
Asian	–	66.4	0.75	0.70–0.81	0.77	0.71–0.82	0.83	0.77–0.89
Mixed	–	72.8	1.02	0.96–1.09	0.98	0.92–1.05	0.93	0.88–0.99
White Other	–	67.4	0.79	0.73–0.85	0.81	0.75–0.88	0.82	0.75–0.89
Other	–	67.6	0.79	0.70–0.90	0.76	0.67–0.86	0.79	0.70–0.90

Weighted MI is the process of replacing missing data with substituted values as informed by complete data and marginal population level data. It is used here to address missing ethnicity data.

Numbers (n), percentages (%),OR and 95% CI are shown.