Table 2.
Discrimination of the models for predicting 10-year risk of developing HF in the derivation cohort among Black and White adults.
Race Specific | Not Race Specific | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
oRSF | oRSF (Top-20) |
Forward Cox | Lasso Cox | Ridge Cox | Boosted Cox | GBT | oRSF | |
Black adults | 0.88 (0.86–0.91) |
0.88 (0.85–0.90) |
0.76 (0.71–0.80) |
0.80 (0.75–0.84) |
0.81 (0.50–0.85) |
0.81 (0.74–0.87) |
0.86 (0.84–0.89) |
0.81 (0.78–0.83) |
White adults | 0.89 (0.86–0.91) |
0.88 (0.85–0.90) |
0.77 (0.73–0.80) |
0.78 (0.55–0.84) |
0.78 (0.50–0.82) |
0.82 (0.71–0.87) |
0.87 (0.85–0.90) |
0.80 (0.76–0.85) |
Data presented are C-index (95% confidence interval).
The following models were analyzed: race specific oblique random survival forests specific (oRSF), oRSF with the top 20 most important variables (oRSF top-20), forward stepwise Cox regression (forward Cox), Lasso Cox regression (Lasso Cox), Ridge cox regression (ridge Cox), boosted Cox regression (boosted Cox), gradient boosted trees (GBT), and oRSF with race as a covariate (oRSF not race specific). Confidence intervals are the 95% ranges among 1000 bootstrapped replicates.