Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;63(4):1249–1259. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01269

Table 1. Quality Metrics of Pharmacophore Modelsa.

model 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 all
TP 2 10 29 20 31 8 8 52
FP 0 40 21 10 36 14 4 78
TN 2681 2641 2660 2671 2645 2667 2677 2603
FN 0 2 3 12 1 0 0 2
# of actives in the database 2 12 32 32 32 8 8 54
decoy hitrate (%) 0.00 1.49 0.78 0.37 1.34 0.52 0.15 2.91
accuracy 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.97
YoA 1.00 0.20 0.58 0.67 0.46 0.36 0.67 0.40
EF 1341.50 44.88 49.17 56.52 39.23 122.23 224.08 20.26
EFmax 1341.50 224.42 84.78 84.78 84.78 336.13 336.13 50.65
EF/EFmax 1.00 0.20 0.58 0.67 0.46 0.36 0.67 0.40
sensitivity 1.00 0.83 0.91 0.63 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.96
specificity 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.97
AUC 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.81 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97
a

Only actives within the specific binding mode were considered when calculating the parameters. The database of decoys was composed of 2681 compounds (TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; YoA, the yield of actives; EF, enrichment factor; AUC, the area under the curve).