Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 14;62(8):3445–3456. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03475

Table 2. Calculated Unit Cell Parameters (Å), Unit Cell Volume (Å3), Volume per Atom (Å3), and Selected Bond Lengths (Å) for YSr2Cu2FeO7 and YSr2Cu2FeO8 Idealized Oxidesa.

YSr2FeCu2O8 experimental YSr2FeCu2O7.85 GGA GGA + U SCAN YSr2FeCu2O7 experimentalb YSr2FeCu2O7.08 C-AF GGA C-AF GGA + U C-AF SCAN
a, b 3.8145(3) 3.8252 3.8315 3.7861 a 22.9136(5)b 23.1337 23.1424 22.8529
c 11.327(7) 11.3803 11.5457 11.2755 b 5.4577(1)b 5.5007 5.5069 5.4411
V 164.81(1) 166.52 169.50 161.62 c 5.4053(1)b 5.4241 5.4265 5.3744
V per atom 11.77 11.89 12.10 11.54 V 675.98(2) 690.13 691.63 668.22
d Fe–O3 1.9072(2) 1.9126 1.9157 1.8930 V per atom 13.00 13.27 13.30 12.85
d Fe–O1 1.843(4) 1.8550 1.8813 1.8417 mean d Fe–O 1.8732 1.8754 1.9014 1.8732
d Fe–O1/d Fe–O3 0.9663 0.9699 0.9820 0.9729 Fe–O3–Fe 124.6° 126.0° 122.9° 124.5°
d Cu–O2 1.9244(4) 1.9355 1.9473 1.9147 d Cu–O2 1.933(2)/1.934(2) 1.9365/1.9456 1.9413/1.9507 1.9267/1.9338
d Cu–O1 2.117(4) 2.1134 2.1197 2.0812 d Cu–O1 2.302(4) 2.4327 2.3883 2.3449
d Cu–O1/d Cu–O2 1.1000 1.0919 1.0885 1.0870 d Cu–O1/d Cu–O2 1.1906 1.2533 1.2273 1.2148
d Cu–Cu 3.407(4) 3.4435 3.5439 3.4297 d Cu–Cu 3.384(4) 3.2837 3.3506 3.3095
d Cu–Fe 3.960(3) 3.9684 4.0009 3.9229 d Cu–Fe 4.056(2) 4.1639 4.1337 4.0815
a

The experimental data of YSr2Cu2FeO7.86 (ICSD—11514) and YSr2Cu2FeO7.08 (this work) are included for comparison. For the GGA + U method, a value of U = 4 eV is used for both Cu and Fe.

b

Lattice parameters given in the setting for the S.G. Ima2. The unit cell metrics corresponding with the S.G. Imma (Table 1) is a (Imma) < > c (Ima2); b (Imma) < > a (Ima2); and c (Imma) < > b (Ima2).