Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 16;9(3):e13752. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13752

Table 3.

Comparison of Pu sinr with different algorithms.

No of SUs Algorithm PU SINR (db) Percentage improvement by ACO.
500 FA 13.8986 −28.33%
GA 18.8615 −73.88%
FAGA 22.0615 −104.06%
ACO 17.112 −58.28%
FAGAACO 10.8108
1000 FA 14.7334 −209.23%
GA −13.6379 1.1%
FAGA 11.3487 −184.1%
ACO 7.5713 −156.1%
FAGAACO −13.4882