Table 3.
Comparison of Pu sinr with different algorithms.
| No of SUs | Algorithm | PU SINR (db) | Percentage improvement by ACO. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | FA | 13.8986 | −28.33% |
| GA | 18.8615 | −73.88% | |
| FAGA | 22.0615 | −104.06% | |
| ACO | 17.112 | −58.28% | |
| FAGAACO | 10.8108 | ||
| 1000 | FA | 14.7334 | −209.23% |
| GA | −13.6379 | 1.1% | |
| FAGA | 11.3487 | −184.1% | |
| ACO | 7.5713 | −156.1% | |
| FAGAACO | −13.4882 |