Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 28;18:7. doi: 10.1186/s13062-023-00362-0

Table 3.

The real number of scientific articles necessary to generate a literature body of given FPE values

FPE threshold range Min Max Median Mean RMSD
(A)
T1 1 29 3 3.82 3.27
T5 5 94 13 16.56 11.09
T10 10 146 26 32.23 19.68
T15 15 184 40 46.94 26.09
T20 20 239 53 62.21 33.46
T25 25 311 65 76.14 39.44
T30 31 363 78 89.36 44.75
T35 37 445 90 102.66 49.86
T40 42 490 100 114.83 54.91
T45 48 514 114 128.42 60.26
T50 53 475 125 140.96 64.85
T75 81 594 187 204.00 85.81
T100 113 868 243.5 267.91 113.82
T500 632 1908 1001 1102.7 339.98
(B)
T1 1 57 2 4.38 5.53
T5 5 232 12 19.68 18.83
T10 10 470 26 39.02 34.94
T15 15 825 41 59.04 52.13
T20 20 1116 56 78.96 69.47
T25 25 1279 70 98.31 86.18
T30 30 1343 85 118.06 102.14
T35 35 1584 100 137.20 114.52
T40 40 1731 115 157.51 132.06
T45 45 2027 129 176.16 147.20
T50 50 2418 145 196.24 164.89
T75 75 2699 218 291.68 238.85
T100 100 2890 291 384.09 310.62
T500 502 10,167 1417 1753.57 1158.06

The letter “T” in abbreviations “T0, T1, etc.” stands for “threshold” applied to FPE values (see Table 2). We list the minimal (Min), maximal (Max), median and mean (together with the respective standard deviation—SD) numbers of articles associated with genes in the year when they crossed certain literature thresholds. As a trend, the number of actual articles is 2–3 times larger than the FPE value itself

Table 3 (A) shows the results for the E.coli literature whereas, (B) presents the data for the body of literature about human genes. Regardless of the taxon, we see similar trends with regard to number of actual publications for a given FPE range