Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2022 Sep 8;43(28):1911–1922. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26991

TABLE 5.

Occupancy of hydrogen bonds between ligand 1 and the protein in each of the five macrostates shown in the network model of Figure 4. Only hydrogen bonds present in more than 1% of frames are shown. Hydrogen bonds were defined by distance and angle criteria of 3.5 Å between donor and acceptor and angle of 20° deviation from straightness. Names for atoms in ligand 1 are as shown in Figure 1

Donor Acceptor Macrostate
0 1 2 3 4
E509 N Ligand 1 O32 1.01 3.24 1.43 1.07
Ligand 1 N25 E509 OE1 1.16 1.59
N517 ND2 Ligand 1 N2 4.74
Ligand 1 N9 N517 OD1 1.86
Y505 N Ligand 1 N2 47.80 27.89 28.21
Ligand 1 N9 Y505 O 32.09 11.63 6.72
E433 N Ligand 1 O32 1.81 2.52 3.35 6.80
E433 N Ligand 1 O33 1.41 3.44 1.23
Ligand 1 N9 E433 O 2.90
Ligand 1 N25 E509 OE2 2.32
H512 ND1 Ligand 1 O26 1.12