TABLE 1.
List of datasets included in the pooled data analyses and participant/study characteristics
| Experiment | OSF | N | Participant characteristics | Intrusive memory diary characteristics | IES/IES‐R | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, M (SD) | Gender (n) | Location | Sample | Diary duration | Diary accuracy, M (SD) | |||||
| Female | Male | |||||||||
| Laboratory | ||||||||||
| Holmes et al. (2009) | N/A | 40 | 23.05 (5.42) | 18 | 22 | UK | Non‐clinical | 7 days | 7.70 (2.60) a | IES |
| Lang et al. (2009) | N/A | 48 | 29.52 (10.89) | 24 | 24 | UK | Non‐clinical | 7 days | 8.42 (1.07) b | IES |
| James et al. (2015)—EXP 1 | https://osf.io/ideta/ | 52 | 24.46 (6.05) | 31 | 21 | UK | Non‐clinical | 7 days | 8.27 (1.52) b | IES‐R |
| James et al. (2015)—EXP 2 | https://osf.io/ideta/ | 72 | 25.72 (8.51) | 47 | 25 | UK | Non‐clinical | 7 days | 8.40 (1.21) b | IES‐R |
| Woud, Blackwell, et al. (2018) | N/A | 94 | 23.09 (3.64) | 72 | 22 | Germany | Non‐clinical | 7 days | 8.33 (1.56) b | IES‐R |
| Woud, Cwik, et al. (2018) | N/A | 36 c | 23.19 (4.37) | 17 | 19 | UK | Non‐clinical | 24 h | N/A | IES‐R |
| Porcheret et al. (2019) | N/A | 50 | 24.20 (4.16) | 27 | 21 d | UK | Non‐clinical | 6 days | N/A | IES‐R |
| Clinical | ||||||||||
| Iyadurai et al. (2018) | https://osf.io/e4hc7/ | 67 e | N/A | N/A | N/A | UK | Patients from ED | 7 days | 8.25 (1.62) a | IES‐R |
| Porcheret et al. (2020) | https://osf.io/fsn2f/ | 84 f | N/A | N/A | N/A | UK | Patients from ED g | 7 days | 7.94 (1.45) a | IES‐R |
| Kanstrup et al. (2021) | https://osf.io/nma5q/ | 32 h | N/A | N/A | N/A | Sweden | Patients from ED | 7 days | 8.55 (1.45) a | IES‐R |
| Singh et al. (2021) | All data reported within the manuscript | 3 | ∼50 | 3 | 0 | Sweden | Nurses who experienced work‐related trauma | 7 days | 8.00 (3.46) a | IES‐R |
Abbreviations: ED, Emergency Department; IES, Impact of Event Scale; IES‐R, Impact of Event Scale‐Revised; M, Mean; OSF, Open Science Framework; SD, standard deviation.
Accuracy rating was an 11‐point scale (0–10).
Accuracy rating was a 10‐point scale (1–10).
The original paper had 38 participants, however due to missing diary data from one participant and missing IES‐R data from another participant, only n = 36 were available for analysis.
One participant had missing age/gender data and one participant indicated they prefer not to answer the gender question.
Only per‐protocol participants.
Three participants had missing diary data, therefore only 84 participants were included in analysis.
Had experienced/witnessed a traumatic event.
Only per‐protocol participants, n = 30 rated diary accuracy and an additional seven participants had missing data for IES‐R and could not be included in analysis.