Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;54(5):1774–1791. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05928-5
Topic Item no Guide questions/description Location
Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity
Personal characteristics
Interviewer/facilitator 1 Which author/s conducted the interview or focus groups Method
Credentials 2 What were the researcher’s credentials? E.g., PhD, MD Method
Occupation 3 What was their occupation at the time of the study? Method
Gender 4 Was the researcher male or female? Method
Experience and training 5 What experience or training did the researcher have? Method
Relationship with participants
Relationship established 6 Was relationship established prior to study commencement? Method
Participant knowledge of the interviewer 7 What did the participants know about the researcher? E.g., personal goals, reasons for doing the research Method
Interview characteristics 8 What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? E.g., bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic Method
Domain 2: Study design
Theoretical framework
Methodological orientation and Theory 9 What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? E.g., grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis Method
Participant selection
Sampling 10 How were participants selected? E.g., purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball Method
Method of approach 11 How were participants approached? E.g., face-to-face, telephone, mail, email Method
Sample size 12 How many participants were in the study? Method
Non-participation 13 How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? Method
Setting
Setting of data collection 14 Where was the data collected? E.g., Home, clinic, workplace Method
Presence of non-participants 15 Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? Method
Description of sample 16 What are the important characteristics of the sample? E.g., demographic data Method
Data collection
Interview guide 17 Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? Method and Appendix C
Repeat interviews 18 Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? N/A
Audio/visual recording 19 Did the researcher use audio or video recording to collect the data? Method
Field notes 20 Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? Method
Duration 21 What was the duration of the interviews or focus group? Method
Data saturation 22 Was data saturation discussed?

N/A

The concept of data saturation is incompatible with a reflexive thematic analysis approach as adopted in this paper (see Braun & Clarke, 2019)

Transcripts returned 23 Were transcripts returned to participants to comment and/or correction? Method
Domain 3: Analysis and findings
Data analysis
Number of data coders 24 How many data coders coded the data? Method
Description of the coding tree 25 Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? Results
Derivation of themes 26 Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? Method
Software 27 What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? Method
Participant checking 28 Did participants provide feedback on the findings? Method
Reporting
Quotations presented 29 Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? E.g., participant number Results
Data and findings consistent 30 Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? Results
Clarity of major themes 31 Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? Results
Clarity of minor themes 32 Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes

Results

No distinction made specifically of minor themes, but examples of diverse views embedded within the consideration of each theme, reflecting real-world complexity