Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 24;38(3):489–502. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac249

Table II.

Characteristics of studies on live birth rate after oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation included in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author, year of publication, country Study design and type Study period Females before treatment for FP (n) Age, years (mean/median/min–max) Number vitrified oocytes (mean) Age at retrieval, years (mean ± SD) Age retrieval, years (min–max) Females with oocyte reutilization (n)
Garcia-Velasco, 2013, Spain Retrospective cohort March 2007–June 2012 475 31.9/–/– 8.5 31.9 ± 5.1 4
Martinez, 2014, Spain Retrospective cohort May 2007–November 2012 357 31.9/–/15–43 5.9 35.6 ± 3.4 30–41 11
Alvarez, 2018, UK Retrospective cohort January 2000–December 2014 306 30.3/–/17–43 2
Cobo, 2018, Spain Retrospective cohort January 2007–May 2018 1073 32.3/–/– 9.5 34.8 ± 2.1 80
Diaz-Garcia, 2018, Spain Prospective cohort January 2005–December 2015 1024 31.7/–/– 35.2 ± 3.1 49
Moravek, 2018, USA Retrospective cohort January 2005–January 2016 204 –/31/15–42 41.1 1
Specchia, 2019, Italy Retrospective cohort January 2001–March 2019 244 31.3/–/16–45 9.5 35.2 ± 4.1 25–41 11
Kato, 2021, Japan Retrospective cohort February 2007–December 2019 162 26.2/–/16–40 6.3 29.5 ± 1.1 14
Mayeur, 2021, France Retrospective cohort January2009–December 2019 6 –/35.5/– 6

FP, fertility preservation.