Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and ultimately fatal disease. Recent findings have shown a marked metabolic reprogramming associated with changes in mitochondrial homeostasis and autophagy during pulmonary fibrosis. The microRNA-33 (miR-33) family of microRNAs (miRNAs) encoded within the introns of sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) genes are master regulators of sterol and fatty acid (FA) metabolism. miR-33 controls macrophage immunometabolic response and enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, FA oxidation, and cholesterol efflux. Here, we show that miR-33 levels are increased in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells isolated from patients with IPF compared with healthy controls. We demonstrate that specific genetic ablation of miR-33 in macrophages protects against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. The absence of miR-33 in macrophages improves mitochondrial homeostasis and increases autophagy while decreasing inflammatory response after bleomycin injury. Notably, pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 in macrophages via administration of anti–miR-33 peptide nucleic acids (PNA-33) attenuates fibrosis in different in vivo and ex vivo mice and human models of pulmonary fibrosis. These studies elucidate a major role of miR-33 in macrophages in the regulation of pulmonary fibrosis and uncover a potentially novel therapeutic approach to treat this disease.
Keywords: Metabolism, Pulmonology
Keywords: Autophagy, Fatty acid oxidation, Fibrosis
Introduction
Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF) is a chronic, fatal, and progressive disease characterized by an aberrant wound healing caused by repetitive alveolar epithelial cell injury and excessive deposition of extracellular matrix proteins in the interstitial space of the lung (1). There are 2 main types of pulmonary fibrosis: (a) with unknown etiology (idiopathic) and (b) secondary to autoimmunity exposure to environmental factors such as foreign antigens, toxins, chemical warfare, radiation, or viral infection. The median survival of idiopathic PF (IPF) is 3–5 years after initial diagnosis, and its incidence continues to rise (1–3). Two FDA-approved drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, slow disease progression but have no effect on patient symptoms or quality of life, and the only curative treatment for PF is lung transplantation (4).
A growing body of evidence supports the role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of PF. Although many cell types are involved in tissue repair, macrophages have been shown to exhibit critical regulatory activity at all stages of repair and fibrosis (5). Consequently, because macrophages represent potentially important therapeutic targets, there has been a great deal of interest over the past few years in deciphering the contributions of the different macrophage populations that control the initiation, maintenance, and resolution of wound-healing responses (5). Lung macrophages are critical components of the pulmonary fibrotic response in mice and humans, as has been most recently demonstrated by studies that applied single-cell RNA-Seq technologies (6, 7) and by numerous mechanistic studies (8–10). In the past decade, there has been increased recognition of the roles of aging, innate immunity, metabolic reprogramming, and mitochondrial dysfunction in PF (10–13), and it has been shown that mitochondria in alveolar macrophages (AM) from patients with IPF have prominent morphological and transcriptional defects (14). Taken together, manipulation of these macrophages and their metabolic programs may present an attractive therapeutic strategy to treat PF (15).
The miR-33 family (miR-33a and miR-33b) of intronic miRNAs has been shown to control lipid metabolism as well as cellular energy status and mitochondrial function (16–23). Inhibition of endogenous miR-33 in macrophages promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and efficient production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (16, 24). miR-33 sustains cardiac fibrosis and remodeling by preserving lipid raft cholesterol content and controlling proliferation in cardiac fibroblasts (25). Loss or inhibition of miR-33 is protective in multiple models of kidney dysfunction, and this may be, in part, due to a reduction of the repression of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in fibrotic kidneys and reduced lipid accumulation (26). Additionally, hepatic miR-33 deficiency has been demonstrated to protect against liver fibrosis and improve metabolic function in mice fed a high-fat diet (27). However, the regulatory role of miR-33 in the context of lung fibrosis has not been elucidated yet.
In this study, we discovered that miR-33 regulates the immunometabolic responses of macrophages during PF. Most importantly, we demonstrate that miR-33 therapeutic silencing in lung macrophages attenuates the progression of lung fibrosis in in vivo and ex vivo models. These findings may overcome one of the main problems in treating lung-related disorders with RNA-based medicines: the lack of targeted miRNA delivery technology to minimize off-target effects and improve the safety of miRNAs in vivo (28).
Results
miR-33 levels are increased in monocytes/macrophages isolated from bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) and lungs of patients with IPF compared with healthy controls.
We evaluated the level of miR-33 in BAL cells, obtained from 62 well-characterized patients with IPF and 10 age-matched healthy controls (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.158100DS1). This analysis revealed that miR-33 is significantly increased in IPF cells compared with controls (fold change, +2.5; P = 0.0024) (Figure 1A). Since more than 90% of BAL cells are immune cells, we aimed to evaluate miR-33 levels in the immune cells of the human lungs. We isolated CD45+ cells from the lungs of the patients with IPF (n = 9) (Supplemental Table 2) and identified a significant increase in miR-33 levels (P = 0.023) in IPF CD45+ cells compared with controls (n = 4) (Figure 1B). Interestingly, the expression of miR-33 in IPF CD45– populations was significantly lower than controls (P ≤ 0.001), and this suggested a potentially important regulatory role for miR-33 in immune cells and perhaps monocyte/macrophage populations in IPF. To expand our analysis and provide a better understanding of miR-33 regulation in humans, we assessed indicators of miR-33 activity in publicly available gene expression lung data sets. We identified miR-33 target genes in 2 gene expression data sets, 1 from lung tissue (Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO] accession no. GSE47460) and 1 from BAL (GSE70866). Since a single gene’s expression is a poor correlate for miRNA activity, we determined overall miRNA activity by analyzing all target genes using Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA). This analysis revealed that miR–33-5p target gene expression is significantly decreased in both IPF BAL (5p, P = 0.000187; 3p, P = 2.57 × 10–5) (Figure 1C) and IPF lung tissues (5p, P = 2.64 × 10–6) (Figure 1D). Targets of the 3p strand of the microRNA were significantly decreased in BAL but not in lung tissue (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B).
Myeloid-specific miR-33–KO mice are protected against bleomycin-induced PF.
To directly test the immune cell–specific role of miR-33, we generated myeloid-specific miR-33–KO mice (LysMCRE+miR-33LOX/LOX [miR-33M/M–/–] and appropriate controls LysMCRE–miR-33LOX/LOX [miR-33M/M+/+]) and subjected them to a bleomycin-induced PF model. The evaluation of miR-33 levels in BAL AM, as well as the total lungs of these mice, confirmed the absence of miR-33 in macrophages and confirmed that bleomycin administration increased the levels of miR-33 in control mice compared with the saline-treated group (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 2A). miR-33M/M–/– mice were protected from bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, as indicated by a reduction in collagen content, measured by hydroxyproline assay (fold change, –2; P ≤ 0.0001) (Figure 2B) and expression of profibrotic genes including Col1a1 and Acta2 (fold change, –2.5; P ≤ 0.0001) (Figure 2, C and D). The histological evaluations using Masson’s trichrome staining of lung tissues confirmed these findings (Figure 2, E and F). Next, we evaluated the inflammatory response in these mice via the measurements of BAL cell recovery and the cytokine levels after the bleomycin injury. BAL total cell numbers, as well as macrophage and lymphocyte cell numbers, were significantly increased in the control mice with bleomycin treatment and largely ameliorated in the absence of miR-33 (Figure 2G). Measurements of cytokine panels in the BAL isolated from these mice revealed that many of the inflammatory markers, including TNF-α, IL-12p70, IL-2, INF-γ, KC-GRO, IL-10, IL-13, and IL-4, are decreased in the absence of miR-33 after bleomycin injury (Figure 2, H–O).
We investigated the expression of miR-33 target transcripts relevant to mitochondrial homeostasis in these samples and identified numerous targets, including peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (Pgc-1α, Ppargc1a), carnitine o-octanoyltransferase (Crot), carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 α (Cpt1α), and ATP binding cassette subfamily A member1 (Abca1), with increased expression in the absence of miR-33 at baseline and after bleomycin exposure (Figure 2, P–S). The same pattern of changes was observed in the level of Sirtuin3 (Sirt3) expression (Figure 2T), which could be secondary to other effects induced by the absence of miR-33. As expected, the administration of bleomycin reduced the expression of some of these genes in the control mice (Figure 2, P–T). The expression of the miR-33 host gene, Sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2 (Srebp-2), was increased in the lungs of the miR-33M/M–/– mice (Supplemental Figure 2, B and C). These data reveal the protective effect of macrophage-specific miR-33 ablation in the bleomycin model of PF in mice and suggested that this effect could be via alterations in the expression of target genes relevant to mitochondrial function.
Pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 in lung macrophages protects against bleomycin in an in vivo murine model of PF.
Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are synthetic analogs of DNA composed of nucleobases that are connected to a pseudo-peptide backbone, which imparts resistance to nuclease enzymes and considerably increases stability and half-life (29, 30). We generated and assessed the efficacy of anti–miR-33 PNA (PNA-33) as a cell-specific inhibitor for miR-33. Our results show that PNA-33 binds specifically to well-established miR-33 target transcripts by gel shift assay (Figure 3A). In prior studies, we optimized the protocol for the preparation of PNA conjugates containing the fluorophore TAMRA (31). We administered PNA-33 TAMRA–conjugated anti-miR in WT mice via an i.v. route and confirmed the accumulation of the compound in lung macrophages 24 hours after injection using a 2-photon microscopy imaging system (Figure 3B). Next, we administered PNA-33 and scrambled control in WT mice via an i.n. route, which is the most efficient method for direct delivery to the lung and isolated lungs and AM at different time points. As shown in Figure 3C, miR-33 levels were dramatically decreased, specifically in AM after PNA-33 administration, and they remained at low levels even 5 days after a single administration of PNA-33 (Figure 3C). After confirming the efficacy of PNA-33 in delivering and antagonizing miR-33 in macrophages, we tested whether therapeutic silencing of miR-33 using PNA-33 protects against bleomycin-induced PF in mice. Notably, we found that intranasal administration of PNA-33 markedly reduces lung fibrosis, as indicated by a significant decrease in collagen content and fibrogenic gene expression (Col1a1 and Acta2) compared with mice treated with scrambled control (Figure 3, D–F). Histological assessments in lung sections via quantifications of the collagen accumulations in Masson’s trichrome staining confirmed the fibroprotective effects of PNA-33 in this mice model (Figure 3, G and H). Consistent with what we observed in miR-33M/M–/– mice, the expression of mitochondrial-related miR-33 target genes Pgc-1α and Abca1 was increased in response to PNA-33 treatment (Figure 3, I and J).
Our results demonstrate that macrophage-specific deletion and pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 in the lung protect against bleomycin-induced PF in in vivo model.
The absence of miR-33 in macrophages improves mitochondrial homeostasis at baseline and after bleomycin injury.
To understand the mechanism behind the fibroprotective effects of miR-33 inhibition and to confirm its regulatory role in the expression of genes associated with mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism in macrophages, we tested primary mice AM in an ex vivo system. Inhibition of miR-33 using a miR-33 antagomir with or without bleomycin treatment revealed a significant increase in the expression of miR-33 target genes Pgc-1α, Abca1, and Sirt3, indicating a role of miR-33 in regulating key mitochondrial pathways (Figure 4, A–D). To further explore the regulatory role of miR-33 in mitochondrial homeostasis in macrophages, we measured mitochondrial function in primary AM isolated from myeloid-specific miR-33–KO mice by Seahorse XF96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer. As expected, mitochondrial activity in AM of control mice was very limited at baseline and after bleomycin injury. Interestingly, we found a dramatic increase in mitochondrial function, as indicated by a significant increase in oxygen consumption rate (OCR, pmol/min) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, pmpH/min) (fold change, +3), in the miR-33M/M–/– AM compared with control AM at baseline and after bleomycin exposure (Figure 4, E–H).
Emerging evidence suggests that the examination of circulating mtDNA could be a mechanism-based prognostic biomarker of PF (32). Thus, we evaluated mtDNA in the extracellular fraction of the BAL isolated from miR-33M/M–/– and controls after bleomycin injury (32). Notably, we observed a significant increase in mtDNA content in control mice after bleomycin injury but not in the absence of miR-33 in macrophages after bleomycin or even at baseline (Figure 4I). Since we observed an improved oxygenation rate and decreased extracellular mitochondrial DNA in the BAL, we hypothesized that miR-33 deficiency improves mitochondrial stability. To evaluate the effect of miR-33 inhibition on structural alterations in the mitochondria in the lung, we performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging analyses on lung tissues as well as AM isolated from control and miR-33M/M–/– mice (Figure 4, J–M). Ultrastructural qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that the mitochondria in macrophages from control mice after bleomycin injury were dysmorphic and contained disorganized cristae (Figure 4, L, N, and O). These deleterious morphological mitochondrial alterations were partially prevented in macrophages from miR-33M/M–/– mice. Detailed morphometric analysis of macrophages from miR-33M/M–/– mice demonstrated a significant improvement in the mitochondrial structure as well as an increase in the mitochondrial number and area at the baseline and, strikingly, after bleomycin exposure (Figure 4, M–O).
The absence of miR-33 in macrophages induces autophagy after bleomycin injury.
We extended our investigation by further evaluating the TEM images acquired from the lung tissues and AM from miR-33M/M–/– mice after bleomycin exposure. In addition to the improvement in mitochondrial structure, we found a dramatic enhancement in autophagy, as visualized by an increase in autophagosome contents, specifically in the miR-33M/M–/– macrophages after bleomycin (Figure 5A). Given that AMP-activated protein kinase α (AMPK-α) and PGC-1α are well-established miR-33 target genes, relevant to mitochondrial homeostasis and autophagy, we evaluated their protein expressions in these mice. Western blot analysis of the lung tissues revealed an increase in the expression of phospho–AMPK-α and PGC-1α in miR-33M/M–/– mice at baseline and after bleomycin exposure compared with control mice (Figure 5B). To confirm the relationship between the absence of miR-33 in macrophages and autophagy, we also evaluated AM after the inhibition of miR-33 using an antagomir and found an increase in phospho–AMPK-α as well as LC3A/B and P62 (also known as SQSTM1) expression in these cells compared with the scrambled control (Figure 5C). IHC staining in lung tissues isolated from miR-33M/M–/– mice showed a significant increase in LC3A/B+ (Figure 5, D and E) and P62+ (Figure 5, F and G) cells in these mice compared with controls after bleomycin injury. Co-IHC of LC3A/B and P62, along with F4/80 (a marker of macrophages in the lung), identified colocalization of F4/80 with LC3A/B and P62 in the lungs of miR-33M/M–/– mice after bleomycin (Supplemental Figure 3, A–C).
miR-33 deficiency in macrophages induced mitophagy in response to injury.
Mitophagy is a quality control mechanism that could be regulated independently of the signals that govern autophagy (33); therefore, we sought to study the effects of miR-33 inhibition on mitophagy after bleomycin injury. To this end, we isolated primary AM from WT mice and treated them with PNA-33 or scrambled control after bleomycin injury. Confocal imaging analysis demonstrated that miR-33 inhibition markedly induced mitophagy at baseline and after bleomycin injury in macrophages (Figure 6, A and B). We next evaluated Pink1 and Parkin gene expression and found a significant increase in the expression of these 2 critical regulators of mitophagy in the miR-33–deficient AM after bleomycin treatment (Figure 6, C and D). Notably, mitophagy was also increased in CD45+ cells isolated from patients with IPF after miR-33 inhibition (Figure 6E), further confirming the concordance of this finding between human and mice lung fibrosis.
Taken together, these data demonstrate the fibroprotective role of macrophage miR-33 ablation via improvement of mitochondrial function and structure at baseline and after bleomycin injury as well as via an increase in autophagy/mitophagy in these cells.
Targeted inhibition of miR-33 in macrophages alters the proinflammatory/antiinflammatory gene expression profile.
Given the importance of macrophages in the Th1/Th2 paradigm in PF, we assessed how miR-33 inhibition influenced macrophage immune responses. We isolated AM from WT mice and skewed them toward M1 (using INF-γ + LPS) or M2 (using IL-13) after miR-33 inhibition using PNA-33. As was expected, INF-γ induced the expression of proinflammatory genes, including arginase 1 (Arg1), chitinase 3 like 1 (Chi3L1), and IL-12; interestingly, the expression of all these profibrotic markers decreased after miR-33 inhibition (Figure 6, F–H). Conversely, INF-γ decreased the expression of Sirt-1, which was reversed after PNA-33 treatment (Figure 6I).
M2 alternative activated macrophages gene expression analysis revealed that miR-33 ablation reversed the IL-13 induced YM1 (also known as Chitinase like 3 [Chil3]) levels in these cells (Figure 6K). Notably, miR-33 inhibition of IL-13–treated cells increased the expression of Abca1 and Ppar-γ (Figure 6, J and L).
This experiment suggests a potential regulatory role for miR-33 in skewing proinflammatory/antiinflammatory macrophages that may be beneficial in fibrosis resolution.
Lack of miR-33 in myeloid cells improves mitochondrial homeostasis and decreases cell death in alveolar type II cells after bleomycin injury.
Given the importance of cell-to-cell communications between macrophages and other players — such as alveolar epithelial cells — in the pathogenesis of PF (34), we sought to determine the impact of myeloid-specific miR-33 deficiency on alveolar epithelial cells. Improvement of mitochondrial integrity and function in alveolar type II cells (AT2) has been shown to have antifibrotic effects (11). We analyzed AT2 morphology in the lung tissue of miR-33M/M–/– mice after bleomycin exposure. As previously reported (35), we confirmed that most of the mitochondria in AT2s of the control mice after bleomycin cells were structurally abnormal and dysmorphic (Figure 7, A and B). The morphometric quantification of the mitochondria in AT2s in the miR-33M/M–/– mice revealed a significant improvement in mitochondrial structure and morphology by area and number at baseline and after bleomycin injury (Figure 7, A–C).
After observing that the absence of miR-33 in the macrophages preserves bleomycin-induced mitochondrial abnormalities in AT2, we further aimed to determine the effects of miR-33 ablation on mitochondria-regulated apoptotic pathways. To this end, we performed a TUNEL assay on the lung tissues after bleomycin and identified a significant increase in apoptosis as indicated by TUNEL+ cells in control mice after bleomycin (Figure 7, D and E). We observed a significant reduction in apoptosis in the lungs of miR-33M/M–/– mice after bleomycin (Figure 7, D and E). We also analyzed whether AT2s in these mice are protected against apoptosis by combining the TUNEL assay with pro–surfactant protein C (Pro-SPC) IF. We found a significant reduction in apoptosis of AT2s (double-positive cells) in miR-33M/M–/– mice compared with the control mice after bleomycin exposure (Figure 7, F and G).
We extended our investigation by performing a deeper analysis of this macrophage–epithelial cell interaction in vitro. To this end, we inhibited miR-33 in AM isolated from untreated WT mice and transferred supernatants from these cells, after miR-33 ablation, to cultured small airway epithelial cells (SAEC). We found that these supernatants significantly reduced bleomycin-induced apoptosis measured by Caspase 3/7 activity in SAEC compared with the supernatants from AM treated with scrambled control (Figure 7, H and I), concordant with the in vivo reduction of the inflammatory cytokines in the BAL of the miR-33M/M–/– mice after bleomycin (Figure 2, H–O). This observation provides evidence for beneficial crosstalk from miR-33–depleted macrophages to a key lung structural cell such as AT2.
Our results reveal that the absence of miR-33 in macrophages could have a protective role on AT2s by improving mitochondrial homeostasis and reducing apoptosis in these cells after bleomycin.
Pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 in lung macrophages protects against ex vivo murine models of PF.
To extend our investigation and to confirm the fibroprotective effects of miR-33 ablation using PNA-33, we used murine precision-cut lung slices (mPCLS) generated from the bleomycin-induced PF model. We isolated lung slices from WT mice on day 14 after bleomycin and treated them with PNA-33 and/or scrambled control for 5 days ex vivo. We also used PNA-33–TAMRA conjugated to validate the successful uptake of this PNA by macrophages in these PCLS. As shown in Figure 8A, PNA-33 not only accumulates in macrophages in PCLS, but it also attenuates collagen accumulation measured by second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy compared with control slices (Figure 8A). This assay also confirmed that there is a significant decrease in fibrogenic gene expression (Col1a1 and Acta2) as well as an increase in miR-33 target gene expressions (Pgc-1a and Abca1) in PNA-33–treated lung slices compared with controls (Figure 8, B–E).
Pharmacologic inhibition of miR-33 ameliorates fibrosis in human PCLS from patients with IPF.
We sought to assess how miR-33 inhibition using PNA-33 affects PF in human lungs. We utilized an ex vivo culture of human PCLS (hPCLS) prepared from human IPF lungs and treated with PNA-33 or scrambled control for 5 days. At the end of the treatment, we performed bulk RNA-Seq to identify the effects of miR-33 inhibition on gene alterations in these fibrotic lung slices. GSVA did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on all miR-33 target genes; however, there was a significant increase in the expression of multiple relevant miR-33 target genes, including PPARGC1A (PGC-1α; P = 0.03) and ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily G Member1 (ABCG1; P = 0.012) after PNA-33 treatment (Supplemental Figure 4, A–D). Further transcriptomic analysis of this IPF PCLS data set revealed that PNA-33 reduced numerous fibrosis-relevant genes including ACTA2 (P = 0.01; fold change, 0.7) and multiple collagen genes (Figure 8F and Supplemental Table 3).
IPF lung single-cell RNA-Seq identified a fibrotic macrophage archetype with a distinct profibrotic signature (6, 36, 37). We evaluated the expression of a signature of 179 profibrotic macrophage genes that are previously reported upregulated in IPF (6, 36, 37), and we discovered that PNA-33 treatment significantly reduced the expression of 74 of these genes in IPF PCLS (Supplemental Table 4). While CTSK (Cathepsin K) is the most downregulated gene after miR33 inhibition in IPF PCLS (P = 0004), the expression of multiple important profibrotic genes from this signature is also decreased, including CHI3L1 (chitinase-3-like protein 1) (P = 0.003; fold change, 0.7), CHIT1 (chitinase 1) (P = 0.001; fold change, 0.8), ITGA8 (integrin subunit α 8) (P = 0.005; fold change, 0.9), ITGB5 (integrin subunit β 5) (P = 0.002; fold change, 0.84), CCL2 and CCL4 (C-C motif chemokine ligand) (P = 0.01; fold change, 0.6; and P = 0.03; fold change, 0.54, respectively), CD36 (cluster of differentiation 36) (P = 0.01; fold change, 0.9), and MERTK (MER proto-oncogene, tyrosine kinase) (P = 0.01; fold change, 0.88) (Figure 8G and Supplemental Table 4).
To validate the ability of PNA-33 to attenuate the IPF macrophage disease signature, we also compared the log fold changes of these genes in IPF PCLS following treatment with PNA-33 to the differentially expressed genes in IPF macrophages from single-cell RNA-Seq data (from 32 IPF lungs and the 28 controls) (37). Our analysis revealed that miR-33 inhibition attenuated multiple genes from the IPF macrophage’s signature list, including CHI3L1, CHIT1, MERTK, CTSK, ITGB5, FN1 (fibronectin 1), LGMN (legumain), LPL (lipoprotein lipase), FABP5 (Fatty acid binding protein 5), LIPA (lipase A), and CTSZ (cathepsin Z) (Figure 8H and Supplemental Table 5).
In summary, the analysis of the ex vivo lung model of fibrosis demonstrated that miR-33 inhibition has potent antifibrotic effects in human lung tissue at the level of gene expression and alters the profibrotic macrophage gene expression in this setting.
Discussion
Metabolic changes in macrophages are recognized as a key feature in the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases, including PF (38). Here, we demonstrate that these metabolic alterations can be improved in the absence of miR-33. miR-33 regulates key biological and metabolic functions — including bioenergetics, autophagy, mitophagy, and induction of inflammation in response to injury — in lung macrophages, and the ablation of this miRNA results in improved resolution of fibrosis. Following the observation that levels of miR-33 are substantially increased in BAL cells as well as in monocytes isolated from the patients with IPF, we studied the role of this miRNA in preclinical models of PF in mice. Genetic deletion of miR-33 in the lung macrophages attenuated PF in the bleomycin mouse model, likely via an improvement in mitochondrial homeostasis as well as augmentation of autophagy. Pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 using i.n. delivery of PNA-33 in mice model of PF, as well as the 3D culture of murine PCLS and human IPF, established the possibility of a macrophage-specific miR-33 inhibitor as a therapeutic approach for PF.
The identification of a novel, effective, long-term anti-fibrotic agent that targets the underlying mechanisms of PF is appealing. Individual miRNAs can modulate the expression of multiple mRNA targets and can have broad effects on multiple cellular pathways. For this reason, therapies targeting individual miRNAs can have a broader impact than traditional single-molecule/single-target approaches. Current anti-miRNA technologies are hindered by physiological and cellular barriers to delivery into target cells. Presenting a targeted lung macrophage, miRNA silencing can be a unique and novel therapeutic approach for PF. PNAs are synthetic analogs of DNA composed of nucleobases that are connected to a pseudo-peptide backbone through a carboxymethylene linker (29, 30). The charge-neutral backbone reduces electrostatic repulsion and enables PNAs to hybridize with DNA and bind to single-strand targets with high specificity and affinity. These constructs are also not susceptible to proteases or nucleases, making PNAs ideal molecules for targeting miRNAs (39). We generated PNA-33 as a specific antisense inhibitor of miR-33 and tested the accumulation of this nanoparticle in the lung macrophages after direct delivery to the lung. The strong antifibrotic protection of this system was evident in the animal model of PF as well as the ex vivo 3D culture system from mice and humans.
There is evidence of the vital role of AM in the process of PF, and they have been presented as the chief effector cells of immune responses with both proinflammatory and antiinflammatory properties (40). miR-33 regulates cellular lipid metabolism and mediates the balance of aerobic glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to instruct macrophage inflammatory polarization and shape innate and adaptive immune responses (16, 41, 42). The ability of miR-33 to reprogram immune cells has been identified as a player in the osteoprotective actions of anti–miR-33 therapies (43). Our discovery that the antifibrotic effects of miR-33 ablation are mediated through enhanced mitochondrial homeostasis, as well as augmented autophagy and repression of postinjury inflammation, opens the possibility of a novel promitochondrial anti-miRNA therapy for PF. Furthermore, the reprogramming of immune cells via miR-33 inhibition could have important implications for a wide variety of diseases characterized by exaggerated immune responses, such as rheumatoid arthritis and asthma.
There is evidence showing the cellular interaction between macrophages and epithelial cells in the process of lung repair and fibrosis (9). It has been shown that, during homeostasis, AM interact with alveolar epithelial cells to clear apoptotic cells, environmental particulates, and pathogens (44). Herein, we documented that the specific ablation of miR-33 in lung macrophages improves mitochondrial homeostasis in macrophages as well as in AT2s after bleomycin injury. We also demonstrated that these AT2s are protected against cell death. This striking cell-to-cell interaction has an important antifibrotic effect, although the cascades of cellular and mechanistic events behind this interaction are yet to be explored.
Autophagy is one of the basic cellular homeostatic processes induced under conditions of stress, and dysregulation of autophagy impacts numerous human diseases, including IPF (45). It has been shown that autophagy is not induced in total human IPF lungs, and there is a decrease in the number of autophagosomes observed with electron microscopy in IPF lungs (46). The regulatory role of this process depends on the cell type and is decreased in lung epithelial cells from patients with IPF and in murine models of IPF (47). At the same time, it has been shown that augmenting autophagy in fibroblasts results in the resolution of PF (48). These findings demonstrate that autophagy plays a vital yet complicated role in the pathogenesis of these chronic diseases. In this study, we presented a profound increase in autophagosome formation in miR-33–deficient macrophages after bleomycin injury. It has also been shown that autophagy plays an essential role in the inflammatory response of the lung to infection and stress (49). We demonstrated a significant decrease in the inflammatory response in our model along with this augmentation in autophagy.
Mitophagy is a highly specialized form of autophagy that is induced to clear the dysfunctional mitochondria after the injury. Insufficient mitophagy gives rise to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, and it is implicated in a cell-specific manner in the pathogenesis of IPF (35, 50, 51). Mitochondrial quality control in lung macrophages is a critical determinant of PF. Diminished mitochondrial quality control results in augmented mitochondrial dysfunction and increased mtROS that leads to PF by promoting profibrotic macrophages (52). The absence of miR-33 in the macrophages leads to an augmentation of autophagy as well as mitophagy, which results in the resolution of fibrosis by polarizing the macrophages from profibrotic to antifibrotic.
Macrophages are innate immune cells, and the interplay between proinflammatory/antiinflammatory macrophage phenotypes has been suggested to play a key role in the development and progression of lung fibrosis as well as a key role in inhibiting fibrosis (53–55). The recent findings from single-cell RNA-Seq data from mice and human lung fibrosis revealed the presence of a distinct profibrotic macrophage subtype in the fibrotic lung, with a higher level of CHI3L1, CHIT1, APOE, and integrins (36, 37, 56–58). Inhibiting miR-33 in PCLS isolated from patients with IPF not only decreased the expression of ACTA2 and collagen, but also altered the expression of genes known to be expressed in profibrotic macrophages, suggesting an effect on this population.
AMPK is a critical cell bioenergetic sensor and metabolic regulator (56). Importantly, previous studies have demonstrated that AMPK activators such as metformin exert protective effects on lung injury (48). In addition to AMPK, PGC-1α is another master regulator of metabolic reprogramming and an inducer of mitochondrial biogenesis, and we previously discovered that thyroid hormone (T3) inhibits lung fibrosis by restoring mitochondrial health and function through a PGC-1α–dependent pathway (11, 13). miR-33 has previously been shown to regulate mitochondrial homeostasis by targeting both Pgc-1α and Ampk in the context of atherosclerosis (17, 22, 59). The importance of the AMPK/SIRT3/PGC-1α pathway in the regulation of metabolic remodeling is also well known (60, 61). AMPK and PGC-1α may modulate autophagy, apoptosis, inflammation, and mitochondrial function through SIRT3 signaling (62, 63). In this work, we confirmed a significant increase in the expression levels of AMPK, PGC-1α, and SIRT3 in miR-33–deficient macrophages; their downstream effects might be responsible for the resolution of PF via an increase in autophagy, decrease in apoptosis, amelioration of the inflammation, and improvement of mitochondrial homeostasis.
Despite elucidating the role of miR-33 in regulating macrophage immune-metabolic response during lung fibrosis, we did not address several important mechanistic insights in this study. For Instance, we did not explore the role of lipid metabolism and FAO in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis. The contribution of miR-33 in regulating lipid metabolism is well established (18–23, 26, 42, 64), although the relationship between this concept and lung fibrosis needs to be explored. In the current study, while we provide strong experimental evidence suggesting active crosstalk between macrophages and other cells in the lung such as epithelial cells, the molecular mechanism that mediates these profibrotic responses need to be further elucidated. Finally, many of our analyses were based on the comparison between advanced IPF samples with disease-free controls; miR-33 may have different effects in different stages of the progression of IPF or in other advanced lung diseases. Thus, future studies will need to assess miR-33 and its targets in different stages of IPF and other lung diseases.
Herein, using in vivo and ex vivo models of PF, we demonstrated that genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of miR-33 in macrophages attenuates lung fibrosis via improvement of mitochondrial homeostasis and augmentation of autophagy. Finally, we propose an efficient targeted therapy for PF that could be further evaluated as a therapeutic strategy in humans.
Methods
Supplemental Methods are available online with this article.
In vitro experiments
Primary mouse AM isolation.
AM was isolated as previously described (65). Briefly, BAL was harvested by slowly injecting and withdrawing 1 mL of PBS into the lung 3 times through a cannula in the trachea. BAL fluid was centrifuged (300g, 5 minutes, 4°C), the cell pellet was washed in PBS, and cells were plated and used for different purposes as described in the appropriate figure legend. For miR-33 inhibition in initial in vitro studies, miR-33 antagomir was purchased from Dharmacon and transfected using lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Cell isolation from human lungs.
Human immune cells were isolated from fresh human lung samples as previously described (66, 67). Briefly, 2–3 g of tissue were used for digestion using (1 mg/mL collagenase/dispase (Roche), 3 U/mL elastase (Worthington), and 20 U/ mL DNAse (Roche) for 30 minutes at 37°C. All CD45+ and CD45– cells were isolated using MACS (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
In vivo experiments
Generation of macrophage-specific miR-33–deficient mice.
Generation of miR-33–conditional KO mice (miR-33loxP/loxP) was accomplished with the assistance of Cyagen Biosciences Inc. The success of this approach has been verified by Southern blotting and confirmed by PCR-based genotyping using specific primers. To generate macrophage/monocyte-specific miR-33–deficient mice, miR-33loxP/loxP mice were crossed with LysMCre mice from The Jackson Laboratory (stock no. 004781).
Bleomycin-induced mice model of PF.
miR-33 macrophage-specific–KO mice (miR-33M/M–/–), and appropriate controls (miR-33M/M+/+) were used in a bleomycin-induced PF model. Briefly, PF was induced in mice by intrapulmonary delivery of bleomycin (1.5 U/kg) or 0.9% normal saline via oropharyngeal instillation. Mice were euthanized, and lungs were harvested on day 14 for fibrosis analysis. Mice were randomly assigned to groups. Mice of both sexes were studied, and 10–15 mice per group were used. The bleomycin challenge was not blinded, but the analysis of animal samples was. All animal model experiments were performed 3 times.
Pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 in mice.
All mice used for this study were WT C57BL/6 (Jackson Laboratories). PF was induced in mice by intrapulmonary delivery of bleomycin (1.5 U/kg) or 0.9% normal saline via oropharyngeal instillation. PNA-33 or scrambled control was administered i.n. (2 mg/kg) on day 7 after the bleomycin injury and repeated every 3 days. Mice were euthanized, and lungs were harvested on day 21 for fibrosis analysis.
Ex vivo experiments
mPCLS.
mPCLS were generated as previously described (68–70). Mouse lungs from both vehicle and bleomycin (day 14) models were used and repeated accordingly. Briefly, low melting grade agarose (3%, weight/volume) was slowly injected via the trachea to artificially inflate the lung. Lungs were cooled at 4°C for 15 minutes to allow jelling of the agarose and then cut to a thickness of 150 μm using a Compresstome (VF-300-0Z by Precisionary) at a cutting speed of 6 μm/s and the oscillation frequency of 5 Hz. The mPCLS were cultured in 24 multiwell plates (Corning) in 500 μL DMEM-F12 no-phenol red containing 0.1% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin 37°C (Sigma-Aldrich), 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. Treatment with PNA-33 or scrambled control was administered in the first 24 hours after slicing, all media were changed daily, and lung slices were isolated 5 days after treatment for analysis. Serial live imaging of lung slices by SHG microscopy was performed before (0 hours) and after each treatment (120 hours) (71). mPCLS were fixed with 4% (weight/volume) paraformaldehyde overnight, and paraffin was embedded at 0 hours and 120 hours. Sections (3 μm) were cut using a microtome, mounted on glass slides, and subjected to antigen retrieval. After deparaffinization and rehydration, staining was performed according to standard protocols for Masson’s trichrome. Finally, samples were mounted using a mounting medium and covered with a cover slip. Microscopic scanning of the slides was conducted in bright-field (BF) with a Nikon inverted microscope at 20× magnification. Two representative images were acquired for each sample, and at least 20 different random fields of view were used for collagen quantification. RNA was isolated from 5–6 replicated lung slices from each treatment using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) at 0 and 120 hours for all groups. mRNA levels of fibrogenic genes were quantified by TaqMan quantitative PCR (qPCR) and normalized to GAPDH expression. All experimental groups were performed in a group of 6 technical replicates and repeated at least 3 times.
hPCLS.
hPCLS was generated from the lungs of the IPF patients as previously described (69). Briefly, right-middle and lower lung lobes were inflated by injecting 2% warm (37°C) low-melting agarose, and peripheral slices (300 μm) were cut with a vibratome and then punched to a diameter of 4 mm using a biopsy punch (69). Individual PCLS/punches were treated with PNA-33 or scrambled control for 5 days. All IPF PCLS were harvested at the end of the 5 days of treatment and were used for RNA extraction using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) for further analysis.
RNA-Seq
Total RNA from all IPF PCLS samples was extracted with miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, 217004) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of the RNA was verified using a NanoDrop at 260 nm, and the quality of the RNA was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were prepared using KAPA Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit. mRNA was enriched by ribosomal RNA depletion. Library quality was checked using an Agilent TapeStation analyzer, and sequencing was performed with NovaSeq (2×100, 25 million reads per sample). FastQC files were generated and trimmed (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/), and a quality review was performed by FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) before and after quality trim. Reads were aligned with STAR aligner (version 2.6.1d, using the default settings) to the HG38 human genome and ENSEMBL94 annotation GTF file. After alignment and summarization with featureCounts of the Subread package (feature Counts release 1.6.3 and Picard version 2.18.21), data were normalized and differential expression was carried out with edgR package (72) and implemented in R.
For comparing the effect of miR-33 inhibition in IPF PCLS to IPF lung macrophage signature, processed single-cell RNA-Seq data of IPF and control lungs (37) was downloaded from GEO (accession no. GSE136831). Gene expression counts were normalized by scaling values to 10,000 transcripts per cell; they were then normalized by natural log transformation with a pseudo count of 1. IPF and control cells labeled as “Macrophage” (37) were extracted from the entire data set, and average normalized gene expression values of all genes were calculated for each subject (32 IPF; 28 controls); these average per subject values were then used for a 2-tailed Student’s t test comparing IPF and control values; the resulting P values were adjusted for FDR. Nonribosomal genes with an adjusted P value below 0.5 and absolute log fold change greater than 0.07 were used to represent differentially expressed genes in IPF macrophage. Of these 1,197 genes, 1,181 genes were also evaluated via bulk RNA-Seq of IPF PCLS either treated or untreated with miR-33 inhibitor. To evaluate miR-33 inhibition’s ability to attenuate the IPF macrophage disease signature, we compared the log fold changes of these genes in ex vivo IPF PCLS following treatment with miR-33 inhibitor to the reported log fold changes in IPF versus control lung macrophage in vivo.
Data and materials availability
All data, code, and materials used in the analysis are available to any researcher for purposes of reproducing or extending the analysis. All raw count expression data from ex vivo studies were deposited to the GEO (accession no. GSE215948).
Statistics
For in vitro and in vivo assays, statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism version 8.1.2. Results were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test for comparisons of 2 groups when sample data were not normally distributed, by unpaired Student’s t test for comparisons of 2 groups with normal distribution, by 1-way ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test for pairwise comparisons of 3 or more groups or more than 10 per group, and by Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA for comparison of groups with fewer than 10 samples per group followed by Dunn’s post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Efficacy experiments were designed for 10–15 animals in the control and treated groups, to allow for 82% power to detect a difference of 20% between the 2 groups at a statistical significance level of 0.05, but the actual size of the groups differed because of mortality. All data were presented as (mean ± SEM), and the differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Unless specified in the text, data are expressed as means of at least 3 independent experiments. Fold change for qPCR was determined using the 2–ΔΔCt method (Livak).
Studies approval
Human studies.
Demographic characteristics of the BAL Freiburg cohort (73) used for miR-33 measurements are described in Supplemental Table 1. IPF diagnosis was established by a multidisciplinary board according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria and was later determined to be consistent with recent guidelines (74). Healthy age- and sex-matched controls were used from the healthy volunteers, and lung disease was ruled out by a pulmonary function test and clinical examination (73). Demographic characteristics of the IPF explant lung samples used for cell isolation used are described in Supplemental Table 2. Age- and sex-matched healthy lungs were from rejected donor lung organs at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital or from donor organs provided by the National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI). The study protocol was approved by the Partners Healthcare IRB (no. 2011P002419) and the Yale University IRB (no. 2000022618).
Animal studies.
All mice were housed and used for the experiments under the direction and approved protocols. All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the NIH guidelines for the humane treatment of animals and were approved by the IACUC of Yale University.
Author contributions
FA, CFH, and NK conceptualized, acquired funding, and supervised the study. NLP and CFH generated macrophage-specific miR-33–KO mice and provided the necessary guidance for this project. All experiments in this study were performed by FA, NLP, SM, MC, JK, SPP, TB, SD, CCJ, KASR, JEM, NRA, GI, NO, JCS, GD, and TSA. PNA-33 was designed and generated by SM and RB. LS, CR, and CSDC provided guidance and necessary supports for this project. AP, JAVN, and IR provided BAL and human lung tissues from IPF and controls for this study. FA and XL prepared and processed all TEM images. The manuscript was drafted by FA, NLP, RB, CFH, and NK and was reviewed and edited by all other authors.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to the Electron Microscopy facility at the CCMI as well as in vivo imaging facility at Yale School of Medicine for all the help they provided for tissue processing and imaging for this study. This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01HL141852, R01HL127349, U01HL145567, and U01HL122626 to NK and R35HL135820 to CFH) and BI Discovery Award 19-004578 to FA.
Version 1. 01/10/2023
In-Press Preview
Version 2. 02/22/2023
Electronic publication
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: NK served as a consultant to Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Third Rock, Pliant, Samumed, NuMedii, Theravance, LifeMax, Three Lake Partners, Optikira, Astra Zeneca, RohBar, Veracyte, Augmanity, CSL Behring, Galapagos, and Thyron over the last 3 years. NK reports Equity in Pliant and Thyron; grants from Veracyte, Boehringer Ingelheim, and BMS; and nonfinancial support from MiRagen and Astra Zeneca. NK has intellectual property on biomarkers and therapeutics in IPF licensed to Biotech. CFH has a patent (no. WO-2012149557-A1) on the use of miR-33 inhibitors to treat inflammation.
Copyright: © 2023, Ahangari et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(4):e158100.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.158100.
Contributor Information
Farida Ahangari, Email: farida.ahangari@yale.edu.
Nathan L. Price, Email: nathan.l.price@yale.edu.
Shipra Malik, Email: shipra.malik@uconn.edu.
Maurizio Chioccioli, Email: maurizio.chioccioli@yale.edu.
Thomas Bärnthaler, Email: thomas.barnthaler@yale.edu.
Taylor S. Adams, Email: taylor.adams@yale.edu.
Jooyoung Kim, Email: jooyoung.kim.jk2765@yale.edu.
Sai Pallavi Pradeep, Email: sai_pallavi.pradeep@uconn.edu.
Shuizi Ding, Email: shuizi.ding@yale.edu.
Kadi-Ann S. Rose, Email: rosekd@mail.uc.edu.
John E. McDonough, Email: john.e.mcdonough@yale.edu.
Nachelle R. Aurelien, Email: NRAurelien@gmail.com.
Gabriel Ibarra, Email: gibarralecompte@lifespan.org.
Norihito Omote, Email: nori920@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Jonas C. Schupp, Email: jonas.schupp@yale.edu.
Giuseppe DeIuliis, Email: joseph.deiuliis@yale.edu.
Lokesh Sharma, Email: lokeshkumar.sharma@yale.edu.
Changwan Ryu, Email: changwan.ryu@yale.edu.
Xinran Liu, Email: xinran.liu@yale.edu.
Antje Prasse, Email: prasse.antje@mh-hannover.de.
Ivan Rosas, Email: ivan.rosas@bcm.edu.
Raman Bahal, Email: raman.bahal@uconn.edu.
Naftali Kaminski, Email: naftali.kaminski@yale.edu.
References
- 1.Meyer KC. Pulmonary fibrosis, part I: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2017;11(5):343–359. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1312346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maher TM, et al. Global incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2021;22(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01791-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wijsenbeek M, et al. Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: current practice in diagnosis and management. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(11):2015–2024. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1647040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lederer DJ, Martinez FJ. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):797–798. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1807508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morse C, et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2019;54(2):1802441. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02441-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reyfman PA, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human lung provides insights into the pathobiology of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;199(12):1517–1536. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2410OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Warheit-Niemi HI, et al. A pathologic two-way street: how innate immunity impacts lung fibrosis and fibrosis impacts lung immunity. Clin Transl Immunology. 2019;8(6):e1065. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheng P, et al. Macrophages in lung injury, repair, and fibrosis. Cells. 2021;10(2):436. doi: 10.3390/cells10020436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ishikawa G, et al. Evolving perspectives on innate immune mechanisms of IPF. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:676569:676569. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.676569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu G, et al. Thyroid hormone inhibits lung fibrosis in mice by improving epithelial mitochondrial function. Nat Med. 2018;24(1):39–49. doi: 10.1038/nm.4447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bueno M, et al. Mitochondria dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming as drivers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2020;33:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zank DC, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: aging, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular bioenergetics. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:10. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tsitoura E, et al. Accumulation of damaged mitochondria in alveolar macrophages with reduced OXPHOS related gene expression in IPF. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1196-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Henderson NC, et al. Fibrosis: from mechanisms to medicines. Nature. 2020;587(7835):555–566. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2938-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ouimet M, et al. MicroRNA-33-dependent regulation of macrophage metabolism directs immune cell polarization in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(12):4334–4348. doi: 10.1172/JCI81676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Price NL, Fernandez-Hernando C. Novel role of miR-33 in regulating of mitochondrial function. Circ Res. 2015;117(3):225–228. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.306949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rayner KJ, et al. MiR-33 contributes to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1570–1573. doi: 10.1126/science.1189862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rayner KJ, et al. Inhibition of miR-33a/b in non-human primates raises plasma HDL and lowers VLDL triglycerides. Nature. 2011;478(7369):404–407. doi: 10.1038/nature10486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horie T, et al. MicroRNA-33 encoded by an intron of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (Srebp2) regulates HDL in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(40):17321–17326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008499107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Marquart TJ, et al. miR-33 links SREBP-2 induction to repression of sterol transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(27):12228–12232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005191107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Davalos A, et al. miR-33a/b contribute to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism and insulin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(22):9232–9237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102281108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Najafi-Shoushtari SH, et al. MicroRNA-33 and the SREBP host genes cooperate to control cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1566–1569. doi: 10.1126/science.1189123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karunakaran D, et al. Macrophage mitochondrial energy status regulates cholesterol efflux and is enhanced by anti-miR33 in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2015;117(3):266–278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang X, Fernandez-Hernando C. miR-33 regulation of adaptive fibrotic response in cardiac remodeling. Circ Res. 2017;120(5):753–755. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Price NL, et al. Genetic deficiency or pharmacological inhibition of miR-33 protects from kidney fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2019;4(22):131102. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.131102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Price NL, et al. Loss of hepatic miR-33 improves metabolic homeostasis and liver function without altering body weight or atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(5):e2006478118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006478118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sato T, et al. MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets in lung disease: prospects and challenges. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015;3(1):382–388. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.1.2015.0160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Egholm M, et al. PNA hybridizes to complementary oligonucleotides obeying the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding rules. Nature. 1993;365(6446):566–568. doi: 10.1038/365566a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nielsen PE, et al. Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide. Science. 1991;254(5037):1497–1500. doi: 10.1126/science.1962210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheng CJ, et al. MicroRNA silencing for cancer therapy targeted to the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 2015;518(7537):107–110. doi: 10.1038/nature13905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ryu C, et al. Extracellular mitochondrial DNA is generated by fibroblasts and predicts death in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1571–1581. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201612-2480OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ashrafi G, Schwarz TL. The pathways of mitophagy for quality control and clearance of mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(1):31–42. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bhattacharya J, Westphalen K. Macrophage-epithelial interactions in pulmonary alveoli. Semin Immunopathol. 2016;38(4):461–469. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0569-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bueno M, et al. PINK1 deficiency impairs mitochondrial homeostasis and promotes lung fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(2):521–538. doi: 10.1172/JCI74942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reyfman PA, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human lung provides insights into the pathobiology of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(12):1517–1536. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2410OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Adams TS, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals ectopic and aberrant lung-resident cell populations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Adv. 2020;6(28):eaba1983. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ogger PP, Byrne AJ. Macrophage metabolic reprogramming during chronic lung disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14(2):282–295. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-00356-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Demidov VV, et al. Stability of peptide nucleic acids in human serum and cellular extracts. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;48(6):1310–1313. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90171-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang L, et al. Macrophages: friend or foe in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Respir Res. 2018;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0864-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Price NL, et al. Genetic dissection of the impact of miR-33a and miR-33b during the progression of atherosclerosis. Cell Rep. 2017;21(5):1317–1330. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Price NL, et al. miR-33 in cardiometabolic diseases: lessons learned from novel animal models and approaches. EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13(5):e12606. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Afonso MS, et al. miR-33 silencing reprograms the immune cell landscape in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res. 2021;128(8):1122–1138. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Young LR, et al. Epithelial-macrophage interactions determine pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. JCI Insight. 2016;1(17):88947. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Patel AS, et al. Autophagy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Margaritopoulos GA, et al. Self-eating: friend or foe? The emerging role of autophagy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:420497. doi: 10.1155/2013/420497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhao H, et al. Autophagy, an important therapeutic target for pulmonary fibrosis diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;502:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rangarajan S, et al. Metformin reverses established lung fibrosis in a bleomycin model. Nat Med. 2018;24(8):1121–1127. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0087-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Racanelli AC, et al. Autophagy and inflammation in chronic respiratory disease. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):221–232. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1389823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kobayashi K, et al. Involvement of PARK2-mediated mitophagy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis pathogenesis. J Immunol. 2016;197(2):504–516. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aggarwal S, et al. Differential regulation of autophagy and mitophagy in pulmonary diseases. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;311(2):L433–L452. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00128.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Larson-Casey JL, et al. Mitochondrial quality control in pulmonary fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2020;33:101426. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Goda C, et al. Loss of FOXM1 in macrophages promotes pulmonary fibrosis by activating p38 MAPK signaling pathway. PLoS Genet. 2020;16(4):e1008692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu G, et al. New therapeutic strategies for IPF: based on the “phagocytosis-secretion-immunization” network regulation mechanism of pulmonary macrophages. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109230. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Desai O, et al. The role of immune and inflammatory cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:43. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schupp JC, et al. Single-cell transcriptional archetypes of airway inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(10):1419–1429. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-0991OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Misharin AV, et al. Monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages drive lung fibrosis and persist in the lung over the life span. J Exp Med. 2017;214(8):2387–2404. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Habermann AC, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Adv. 2020;6(28):eaba1972. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Karunakaran D, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of miR-33 promotes fatty acid oxidation but does not ameliorate metabolic dysfunction in diet-induced obesity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(12):2536–2543. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xu M, et al. Choline ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy by regulating metabolic remodelling and UPRmt through SIRT3-AMPK pathway. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(3):530–545. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang T, et al. SIRT3 promotes lipophagy and chaperon-mediated autophagy to protect hepatocytes against lipotoxicity. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(1):329–344. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0356-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maissan P, et al. Sirtuins-mediated system-level regulation of mammalian tissues at the interface between metabolism and cell cycle: a systematic review. Biology (Basel) 2021;10(3):194. doi: 10.3390/biology10030194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang T, et al. Small molecule-driven SIRT3-autophagy-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition ameliorates inflammatory crosstalk between macrophages and adipocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177(20):4645–4665. doi: 10.1111/bph.15215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Price NL, et al. Genetic ablation of miR-33 increases food intake, enhances adipose tissue expansion, and promotes obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Rep. 2018;22(8):2133–2145. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang X, et al. The isolation and characterization of murine macrophages. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2008;Chapter 14:14.1.1–14.1.14. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1401s83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yu YA, Tighe RM. Isolation and characterization of human lung myeloid cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1809:111–119. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8570-8_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bantikassegn A, et al. Isolation of epithelial, endothelial, and immune cells from lungs of transgenic mice with oncogene-induced lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;52(4):409–417. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0312MA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lehmann M, et al. Differential effects of nintedanib and pirfenidone on lung alveolar epithelial cell function in ex vivo murine and human lung tissue cultures of pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0876-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Alsafadi HN, et al. An ex vivo model to induce early fibrosis-like changes in human precision-cut lung slices. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017;312(6):L896–L902. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00084.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Uhl FE, et al. Preclinical validation and imaging of Wnt-induced repair in human 3D lung tissue cultures. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):1150–1166. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00183214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu Y, et al. Methods for quantifying fibrillar collagen alignment. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1627:429–451. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7113-8_28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Robinson MD, et al. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Prasse A, et al. BAL cell gene expression is indicative of outcome and airway basal cell involvement in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(5):622–630. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2551OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Raghu G, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788–824. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.