Table 3.
Comparison of multifactor regression equations of subjective efficacy and objective efficacy.
| Exposure | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P -value | OR (95% CI) | P -value | |
| Subjective efficacy | ||||
| Satisfaction scores | 0.66 (0.54, 0.82) | 0.000 | 0.52 (0.36, 0.74) | 0.000 |
| Knowledge mastery scores | 0.18 (0.09, 0.36) | 0.000 | 0.09 (0.03, 0.27) | 0.000 |
| Compliance scores | 0.02 (0.00, 0.15) | 0.000 | 0.01 (0.00, 0.13) | 0.000 |
| Objective efficacy | ||||
| Satisfaction scores | 0.65 (0.54, 0.79) | 0.000 | 0.56 (0.43, 0.73) | 0.000 |
| Knowledge mastery scores | 0.12 (0.05, 0.29) | 0.000 | 0.08 (0.03, 0.23) | 0.000 |
| Compliance scores | 0.09 (0.03, 0.21) | 0.000 | 0.07 (0.03, 0.19) | 0.000 |
Data in table: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Result variable: subjective efficacy, objective efficacy.
Exposure variable: satisfaction scores, knowledge mastery scores, compliance scores.
Model 1 adjusted for: sex, age.
Model 2 adjusted for: sex, age, parents' sex, parents' age, hemodynamic type of VVS, parents' education level.