Table 2014.05A.
3M Petrifilm RYM method |
BAM/ISO 21527 methodsa |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Matrix | Lot | n b | Meanc | sr | sR | n | Mean | sr | sR | P-valued | Difference of means | Reverse transformed mean differencee |
Frozen raw ground beef patties | ||||||||||||
25°C, 48 h | Control | 11(0) | <1.00 | —f | — | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 11(0) | 2.12 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 11(1) | 2.07 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.5323 | 0.05 | 14.34 | |
Medium | 11(0) | 3.52 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 11(0) | 3.47 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.1637 | 0.05 | 360.10 | |
High | 11(0) | 4.65 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 11(0) | 4.59 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.2266 | 0.06 | 5763.84 | |
25°C, 60 h | Control | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 11(0) | 2.14 | 0.36g | 0.37 | 11(1) | 2.07 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.3773 | 0.07 | 20.55 | |
Medium | 11(0) | 3.52 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 11(0) | 3.47 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.1573 | 0.05 | 360.10 | |
High | 11(0) | 4.65 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 11(0) | 4.59 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.1750 | 0.06 | 5763.84 | |
28°C, 48 h | Control | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 11(0) | 2.17 | 0.29g | 0.30 | 11(1) | 2.07 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.1391 | 0.10 | 30.42 | |
Medium | 11(0) | 3.53 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 11(0) | 3.47 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.0824 | 0.06 | 437.23 | |
High | 11(0) | 4.67 | 0.08g | 0.11 | 11(0) | 4.59 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.0966 | 0.08 | 7869.00 | |
28°C, 60 h | Control | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 11(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 11(0) | 2.16 | 0.29g | 0.29 | 11(1) | 2.07 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.1843 | 0.09 | 27.05 | |
Medium | 11(0) | 3.53 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 11(0) | 3.47 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.1095 | 0.06 | 437.23 | |
High | 11(0) | 4.67 | 0.08g | 0.11 | 11(0) | 4.59 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.1088 | 0.08 | 7869.00 |
Samples were analyzed by harmonized FDA-BAM Ch. 18 and ISO 21527 methods using 0.1% peptone water as the sample diluent.
n = Number of laboratories that reported complete results. Outliers are in parentheses.
Log10 yeast and mold cfu/g.
Significant difference (P < 0.05).
Results presented as cfu/g.
Not applicable.
Results indicate that the candidate method is more repeatable than the reference methods. sr = Repeatability standard deviation; sR = reproducibility standard deviation.