Table 2014.05B.
3M Petrifilm RYM method |
BAM/ISO 21527 methodsa |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Matrix | Lot | n b | Meanc | sr | sR | n | Mean | sr | sR | P-valued | Difference of means | Reverse transformed mean differencee |
Raw almonds | ||||||||||||
25°C, 48 h | Control | 12(0) | <1.00 | —f | — | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 14(0) | 1.45 | 0.17g | 0.26 | 14(0) | 1.55 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.4165 | 0.10 | –7.30 | |
Medium | 14(1) | 2.12 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 14(0) | 2.21 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.3322 | 0.09 | –30.36 | |
High | 14(2) | 3.00 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 14(1) | 3.08 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.2833 | 0.08 | –202.26 | |
25°C, 60 h | Control | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 14(0) | 1.53 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 14(0) | 1.55 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.8391 | 0.02 | –1.60 | |
Medium | 14(0) | 2.20 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 14(0) | 2.21 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.7789 | 0.01 | –3.69 | |
High | 14(2) | 3.04 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 14(1) | 3.08 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.5418 | 0.04 | –105.79 | |
28°C, 48 h | Control | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 14(0) | 1.58 | 0.16g | 0.21 | 14(0) | 1.55 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.7381 | 0.03 | 2.54 | |
Medium | 14(0) | 2.17 | 0.17g | 0.29 | 14(0) | 2.21 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.6139 | 0.04 | –11.73 | |
High | 14(2) | 3.01 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 14(1) | 3.08 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.3904 | 0.07 | –178.97 | |
28°C, 60 h | Control | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | 12(0) | <1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
Low | 14(0) | 1.60 | 0.17g | 0.20 | 14(0) | 1.55 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.5474 | 0.05 | 4.33 | |
Medium | 14(0) | 2.21 | 0.17g | 0.23 | 14(0) | 2.21 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.9483 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
High | 14(2) | 3.03 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 14(1) | 3.08 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.4687 | 0.05 | –130.75 |
Samples were analyzed by harmonized FDA-BAM Ch. 18 and ISO 21527 methods using 0.1% PW as the sample diluent.
n = Number of laboratories that reported complete results. Outliers are in parentheses.
Log10 yeast and mold cfu/g.
Significant difference (P < 0.05).
Results presented as cfu/g.
Not applicable.
Results indicate that the candidate method is more repeatable than the reference methods. sr = Repeatability standard deviation; sR = reproducibility standard deviation.