Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 14;78(3):692–702. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac446

Table 3.

Comparison of taniborbactam plasma and ELF exposures achieved in humans receiving 0.5 g every 8 h as 4 h infusion versus infected mice receiving taniborbactam in combination with cefepime human-simulated regimen subcutaneously

Matrix/regimen Species %fT>MIC for an MIC (mg/L) of: fAUC0–24 (mg·h/L) fC max (mg/L) ELF:plasma penetration
2 4 8 16 32 64 128
Plasma
Human 99 83 53 0 0 0 0 205.2 15.0
ȃTaniborbactam 1.56% HSR Mouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 0.2
ȃTaniborbactam 12.5% HSR Mouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 1.6
ȃTaniborbactam 100% HSR Mouse 98 93 65 5 0 0 0 229.9 18.1
ELF
ȃTaniborbactam 1.56% HSR Mouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0.2 1.11
ȃTaniborbactam 12.5% HSR Mouse 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 1.5 0.95
ȃTaniborbactam 100% HSR Mouse 100 89 51 0 0 0 0 195.2 15.1 0.85

HSR, human-simulated regimen.