Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 26;78(3):620–635. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac424

Table 3.

Demographic characteristics relationships with ABR awareness scores for human HCPsd

Variable Description Ghana (n = 104) Nigeria (n = 85) Tanzania (n = 126) Peru (n = 84) Vietnam (n = 226)
N (%) Mean SE CI 95% P value N (%) Mean SE CI 95% P value N (%) Mean SE CI 95% P value N (%) Mean SE CI 95% P value N (%) Mean SE CI 95% P value
Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper
Profession Doctor 48 (46.2) 59.7b 1.1 57.6 61.9 0.004c 55 (64.7) 59.27 1.4 56.5 62.0 0.156 32 (25.4) 60.4a 2.1 56.2 64.7 0.003c 53 (63.1) 70.4a 1.6 67.2 73.7 0.000c 73 (32.3) 57.9 1.1 55.7 60.2 0.912
Dentist 2 (1.9) 71.4 20.6 57.2 92.0 8 (9.4) 54.04 3.0 47.0 61.1 8 (6.3) 54.1 2.7 47.7 60.5 30 (35.7) 57.5b 1.4 54.6 60.4
Nurse 21 (20.2) 60.7 1.8 56.8 64.5 56 (44.4) 54.7 0.9 52.9 56.4 53 (23.5) 57.1 1.5 54.1 60.0
Pharmacist 15 (14.4) 68.7a 2.9 62.4 75.0 21 (24.7) 62.37 2.6 57.0 67.8 14 (11.1) 61.9a 3.9 53.6 70.3 62 (27.4) 56.9 1.3 54.4 59.6
Physician Assistant 18 (17.3) 58.5b 2.0 54.2 62.7 38 (16.8) 58.0 1.7 54.7 61.4
Medical Officer 16 (12.7) 51.9b 1.9 47.9 56.0
Gender Male 66 (63.5) 61.5 1.1 59.4 63.6 0.809 45 (52.9) 61.42 1.7 57.9 64.9 0.106 57 (45.2) 57.7 1.4 54.9 60.5 0.223 42 (50.0) 68.2 1.9 64.3 72.0 0.055 73 (32.3) 57.1 1.0 55.2 59.1 0.701
Female 37 (35.6) 60.8 1.8 57.1 64.4 40 (47.1) 57.71 1.4 54.9 60.5 69 (54.8) 55.6 1.1 53.3 57.8 42 (50.0) 63.1 1.8 59.5 66.7 153 (67.7) 57.7 0.9 55.9 59.4
Age 18 to 25 10 (9.6) 62.2 2.7 56.0 68.3 0.329 8 (9.4) 57.28 2.4 51.7 62.9 0.711 16 (12.7) 55.9 2.1 51.6 60.3 0.364 14 (16.7) 61.4 1.9 57.2 65.6 0.067 16 (7.1) 61.2 2.5 55.9 66.4 0.119
26 to 35 52 (50.0) 62.3 1.3 59.7 65.0 52 (61.2) 59.92 1.6 56.7 63.2 53 (42.1) 58.6 1.6 55.4 61.9 39 (46.4) 66.3 2.1 62.1 70.5 93 (41.2) 57.3 1.1 55.1 59.5
36 to 45 16 (15.4) 61.4 2.6 55.9 66.9 18 (21.2) 61.22 2.3 56.3 66.1 27 (21.4) 54.9 1.6 51.7 58.3 22 (26.2) 63.5 2.4 58.5 68.5 43 (19) 55.7 1.4 52.9 58.4
46 to 55 13 (12.5) 56.4 2.7 50.6 62.2 7 (8.2) 56.64 2.7 50.0 63.3 12 (9.5) 53.3 1.6 49.8 56.7 3 (3.6) 67.7 7.0 37.8 97.7 52 (23) 57.7 1.3 55.2 60.2
> 55 9 (8.7) 58.9 2.9 52.3 65.7 10 (7.9) 56.8 2.8 50.4 63.1 6 (7.1) 77.8 5.7 63.1 92.6 5 (2.2) 66.1 5.6 50.7 81.6
Training level Non-University NC 0.741 72 (57.1) 54.1b 1.1 52.0 56.2 0.001c 0.776 95 (42) 58.3 1.2 55.8 60.7 0.588
University 104 (100) 61.2 0.9 59.4 63.0 29 (34.1) 60.07 2.1 55.7 64.5 47 (37.3) 60.1a 1.5 57.1 63.2 38 (45.2) 66.4 2.1 62.2 70.5 107 (47.3) 56.8 0.9 55.1 58.5
Specialist 55 (64.7) 59.27 1.4 56.5 62.0 21 (25) 65.3 3.0 59.0 71.7
Postgraduate (MSc, PhD) 1 (0.8) 70.7 21 (25) 63.9 2.1 59.5 68.5 18 (8) 57.7 1.8 54.0 61.5
Type of caree Primary Care 32 (30.8) 59.4 1.33 56.7 62.1 0.05 NC 33 (26.2) 55.9 2.07 51.7 60.1 0.95 41 (48.8) 64.2b 1.73 60.7 67.7 0.01c 141 (62.4) 57.8 0.9 56 59.6 0.65
Secondary Care 54 (51.9) 63.3 1.47 60.4 66.3 57 (45.2) 56.5 1.16 54.2 58.8 19 (22.6) 61.1b 2.69 55.4 66.7 83 (36.7) 57.2 0.99 55.2 59.1
Tertiary Care 18 (17.3) 58.1 1.44 55 61.1 85 (100) 59.7 1.14 57.4 62 14 (11.1) 56.7 2.54 51.2 62.1 20 (23.8) 72.5a 2.96 66.3 78.7
Type of Practice Public practice 78 (75) 60.5 1.09 58.3 62.7 0.24 85 (100) 59.7 1.14 57.4 62 NC 79 (62.7) 55.7 0.84 54.1 57.4 0.09 31 (36.9) 70.9a 2.45 66 76 0.01c 191 (84.5) 57.5 0.77 56 59 0.98
Private practice 11 (10.6) 61.2 1.93 56.9 65.5 32 (25.4) 56.7 1.76 53.2 60.3 35 (41.7) 61.6b 1.73 58.1 65.1 20 (8.8) 57.9 0.86 56.1 59.7
Public and Private practice 15 (14.4) 65 2.46 59.7 70.3 12 (9.5) 62.4 5.48 50.4 74.5 13 (15.5) 63.8 2.85 57.6 70 12 (5.3) 57.9 2.71 51.9 63.8

SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, NC: Not calculated.

Different letters in different rows indicate statistical differences between groups.

Statistical differences (P < 0.05). All P values were calculated with ANOVA and Tukey post hoc comparison test. All significant values are two-tailed.

Includes only participants without missing values in the 23-item scale who replied to the question, therefore differences in numbers of participants across calculations may vary accordingly.

18 participants from Tanzania did not indicate the level of care of their working centres.

Note that while the countries are positioned side by side, it is important to note that scores should be interpreted within-country rather than compared across countries, for example as baseline data within a given country.