Table 1.
Intervention Source | Perception of key stakeholders about whether the intervention is externally or internally developed. |
Evidence Strength & Quality | Stakeholders’ perceptions of the quality and validity of evidence supporting the belief that the intervention will have desired outcomes. |
Relative Advantage | Stakeholders’ perception of the advantage of implementing the intervention versus an alternative solution. |
Adaptability | The degree to which an intervention can be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet local need. |
Trialability | The ability to test the intervention on a small scale in the organization, and to be able to reverse course (undo implementation) if warranted. |
Complexity | Perceived intricacy or difficulty of *the innovation*, reflected by duration, scope, radicalness, disruptiveness, centrality, and intricacy and number of steps required to implement. |
Design Quality & Packaging | Perceived excellence in how the intervention is bundled, presented, and assembled. |
Cost | Costs of the intervention and costs associated with implementing that intervention, including investment, supply, and opportunity costs. |
Note: These definitions are pulled directly from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al., 2009).