Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 8;5(2):877–886. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01436

Table 1. Comparison of Wearable EOG Devices for Classification of Eye Movements and HMI Applications.

references circuit type form factor (cm × cm) integrated single device electrode type no. of electrodes no. of classes classification accuracy (%) platform HMI application
this work flexible 2 × 3 yes dry, membrane (gold) 4 6 98.3 headband with a flexible circuit two-wheeled RC car
(14) rigid, bulky 12 × 15 no dry (gold) 5 4 94 wire-connection with a circuit wheel-chair
(12) rigid, bulky 6 × 6 no dry (gold) 5 5 92 wire-connection with a circuit drone helicopter
(43) rigid, bulky 4 × 6 no dry, (graphene) 3 5 98 headband with rigid circuit RC car
(23) rigid, bulky 5.5 × 8 no dry, (graphene) 3 2   headband with rigid circuit LED array
(44) rigid, bulky 6 × 6 no dry (Ag/AgCl) 5 4   eyeglass  
(45) rigid, bulky 5 × 5 no dry (Ag/AgCl) 4 1   headband with rigid circuit  
(46) rigid, bulky 3 × 20 no dry (silver) 3 2   headband with rigid circuit  
(47) rigid, bulky 5 × 7 no gel (Ag/AgCl) 5 5 75.5 eyeglass omnidirectional-robot
(48) rigid, bulky 4 × 8 no gel (Ag/AgCl) 5 5 97 armband game
(49) rigid, bulky 11 × 16 no gel (Ag/AgCl) 5 5 89 helmet keyboard
(28) rigid, bulky 4 × 8 no gel (Ag/AgCl) 4 6 91.3 rigid headband wheelchair + keyboard