Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;55(1):733–743. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2182908

Table 2.

Demographic and tele-harm reduction component comparisons between those retained and not retained in buprenorphine treatment at three months.

Characteristic Retained at three months (n = 64) Not retained at three months (n = 45) p Value
Age (n,%)     .91
 < =29 years old 12 (60.0) 8 (40.0)  
 30–39 years old 22 (56.4) 17 (43.6)  
 40–59 years old 27 (58.7) 19 (41.3)  
 > =60 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0)  
Biological sex (n,%)     .32
 Male 50 (61.0) 32 (39.0)  
 Female 13 (50.0) 13 (50.0)  
Race/ethnicity (n,%)     .61
 Non-Hispanic White 34 (63.0) 20 (37.0)  
 Non-Hispanic Black 8 (50.0) 8 (50.0)  
 Hispanic 22 (56.4) 17 (43.6)  
Insurance status at enrolment (n,%)     .03
 Insured 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4)  
 Uninsured 42 (51.9) 39 (48.2)  
 Underinsured 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5)  
Housing status at enrolment (n,%)     .13
 Stably housed 20 (54.1) 17 (46.0)  
 Unstably housed (in shelter) 28 (71.8) 11 (28.2)  
 Rough sleeping (street) 16 (50.0) 16 (50.0)  
IDEA SSP participant (n,%) 40 (61.5) 25 (38.5) .47
Stimulant use at baseline 27 (46.6) 31 (53.5) <.01
Saw provider via Telehealth in first three months (n,%) 54 (75.0) 18 (25.0) <.01
Escalated buprenorphine dose post baseline (n,%) 26 (86.7) 4 (13.8) <.01