Table 1.
List of the most relevant in vivo studies concerning RES bioavailability upon oral, i.v. administration of different RES-loaded nanotechnology-based carriers.
Nanocarriers | In vivo model | Via | RES dose | Outcomes (comparatively to free RES) | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
liposomes | Charles Foster rats | i.v. | 2 mg/kg dose. | AUC: 30-fold increased; t1/2: 29.7-fold increased; CL: 33-fold decreased; MRT: 29.5-fold decreased |
Vijayakumar et al. (2016) |
Polymeric nanoparticles (PLGA) | Wistar rats | Oral | 20.0 mg/kg | AUC0→∞ : 10.6-fold increased; Cmax: 1.2-fold increased; Tmax: 28.0-fold increased; Absorption rate: Ka was 7.2-fold increased); |
Singh & Pai (2014) |
Lipid nanocarrier | Wistar rats | i.v. | 2 mg/kg | AUC0→∞:8.7-fold increased; Cmax: 1.4-fold increased; CL: 13.4-fold decreased; t1/2: 15-fold increased. |
Poonia et al. (2020) |
Micelles (TPGS) | Sprague-Dawley rats | Oral | 20.0 mg/kg | AUC0→∞: 3.5-fold increased; Cmax: 2.2-fold increased; MRT: 1.2-fold increased. |
Singh et al. (2017) |
Nanocrystals | Wistar rats | Oral | 40 mg/kg | AUC: 6.3-fold increased; Tmax: 2-fold decreased; Cmax: 3-fold increased; MRT: 3-fold increased. |
Argenziano et al. (2022) |
Nanoemulsions | Wistar rats | Oral | 120 mg/kg | AUC0 →∞: 1.3-fold increased; Cmax: 3.4-fold increased; CL: 1.2-fold decreased; MRT: 1.1-fold decreased; Vd: 1.5-fold decreased. |
Hao et al. (2015) |
Protein-based nanoparticles | Kunming mice | i.v. | 1.5 mg/kg | Targeting efficiency increased; RES accumulation in the liver, kidney, heart, and ovaries; |
Guo et al. (2010) |
AUC: area under the concentration-time curve (plasma exposure); t1/2: plasma half life; CL: clearance; MRT: mean residence time; AUC0 →∞: area under the concentration time-curve from time zero to infinity; Cmax: peak plasma concentration; i.v.: intravenous; Ka: absorption rate constant; PLGA: Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid); RES: Resveratrol; tmax: time to achieve the maximum concentration; TPGS: D-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 400 succinate