Table II. —Results of the Joana Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for quasi-experimental studies.39-42.
Questions | Kas40 | Vincent39 | Gonzalez42 | Michalsen41 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
2. Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the intervention of interest? (history threat/systematic difference/ | N | N | N | N |
3. Was there a control group? | N | N | N | N |
4. Was there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention | Y | Y | Y | Y |
5. Was follow-up complete, and if not, was follow-up adequately reported and strategies to deal with loss to follow-up employed? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
6. Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
7. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Y: yes; N: no.