Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 17;11:1070200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070200

Table 3.

Net attributable health risks and benefits affected by green space: Baseline and scenarios 1–3 compared.

Environment change (intervention, asset or hazard) Health outcome Baseline casesa S1 casesb S2 casesc S3 casesd
NDVI increase Cancer (mouth and throat) - −0.23 −0.23 −0.23
NDVI increase Respiratory (asthma) - - 8 8
NDVI increase Weight gain - - −41 −41
Proximity to green space Activity 2,632 2,632 2,632 2,632
Proximity to green space Mental health 125 125 125 125
Proximity to green space Respiratory (asthma) 5 5 5 5
Proximity to large, attractive, open space Activity 1,432 1,432 1,432 1,432
Quality of green space (pleasantness) Life satisfaction 125 125 125 125
Quality of green space (safety) Life satisfaction 125 125 125 125
Size of public open spaces Diabetes - - −10 -
Park improvements Park use - 171 171 171
Park use Diabetes −3 −3 −3 −3
Park use Weight gain −127 −139 −139 −139
a

Baseline scenario: Population 9,241, all other conditions as present day.

b

Scenario 1: Population 9,241, Policy Compliant.

c

Scenario 2: Population 9,241, 1Ha additional green space in single unit.

d

Scenario 3: Population 9,241, 1Ha additional green space dispersed across site.

Red highlighted text denotes deterioration in health. Green text indicates improvement in health.