Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;12(1):7–18. doi: 10.1159/000526639

Table 4.

p scores for PFS, in the entire cohort and in respective subgroups, derived from individual patient data meta-analysis

Entire cohort HBV HCV Nonviral BCLC B BCLC C MVI MVI/EHS No MVI/EHS
Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab 0.959 0.795 0.718 0.781 0.899 0.793 1.00 0.813 0.830

Ate-Cab 0.855 0.905 0.776 0.482 0.812 0.258

Cabozantinib 0.771

T300+D 0.547

Durvalumab 0.407

Nivolumab 0.551

Lenvatinib 0.840 0.581 0.558 0.564 0.707 0.617 0.682

Linifanib 0.635 0.519 0.247 0.600

Brivanib 0.327

Sunitinib 0.160 0.092 0.344 0.114

Sor-Erl 0.158

Sorafenib 0.289 0.109 0.103 0.237 0.037 0 0.386 0.012 0.129

Placebo 0

p scores are a measure of treatment efficacy with higher scores corresponding to higher efficacy. Blanks indicate that HRs for the subgroup were not reported for studies involving that treatment. Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab, anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand-1 pathway plus vascular endothelial growth receptor monoclonal antibody; Ate-Cab, atezolizumab-cabozantinib; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; EHS, extrahepatic spread; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MVI, macrovascular invasion; T300+D, tremelimumab-durvalumab; Sor-Erl, sorafenib-erlotinib.