Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;69(2):362–369. doi: 10.1177/00207640221091187

Table 1.

Breakdown of interview participants by location.

Location Urban vs rural Patients number interviewed (N), mean age and standard deviation Caregivers number interviewed (N), mean age and standard deviation Community members number interviewed (N), mean age and standard deviation
Ernakulam Rural (Chottinikkara) N = 7
Age = 42.1 (s.d. 4.01)
N = 8
Age = 50.8 (s.d. 16.8)
N = 5
Age = 40 (s.d. 11.4)
Urban (Edappally) N = 8
Age = 32.2 (s.d. 14.1)
N = 8
Age = 50.8 (s.d. 14.9)
N = 8
Age = 34 (s.d. 12.3)
Palakkad Rural N = 8
Age = 39.5 (s.d. 7.5)
N = 8
Age = 44.5 (s.d. 18.9)
N = 8
Age = 40.6 (s.d. 14.9)
Urban N = 8
Age = 41.3 (s.d. 17.1)
N = 9
Age = 53.1 (s.d. 17.7)
N= 8
Age = 60.7 (s.d. 9.9)
Malappuram Rural N = 8
Age = 46.8 (s.d.11.6)
N = 7
Age = 56 (s.d. 10.6)
N = 7
Age = 41.3 (s.d. 5.8)
Urban N = 8
Age = 46.3 (s.d. 9.6)
N = 8
Age = 42.8 (s.d. 15.8)
N = 7
Age = 49.5 (s.d. 11.1)
Calicut Rural N = 8
Age = 42.7 (s.d. 10.5)
N = 7
Age = 60.4 (s.d. 10.8)
N = 7
Age = 46.3 (s.d. 13.9)
Urban N = 7
Age = 33 (s.d. 8.1)
N = 8
Age = 46.6 (s.d. 1.7)
N = 5
Age = 30.8 (s.d. 13.3)