Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 28;30(1):162–171. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.1.14

Table 5.

Correlation coefficient between SDSCA and HbA1c at study level and meta-analysis

Study Correlation for SDSCA total score (95% CI) N1 P-value Correlation for SDSCA diet subscale (95% CI) N2 P-value
Ahmad Sharoni et al. (13) −0.498 200 < 0.001 −0.014 200 0.843
Chew et al. (14) 0.126 283 0.035 0.081 298 0.163
Jannoo et al. (16) 0.017 392 0.732 −0.010 392 0.850
Nur Khairul Bariyyah et al. (18) 0.046 442 0.335 −0.022 499 0.630
Papo et al. (19) −0.100 331 0.069 −0.285 331 < 0.001
Siti Khuzaimah et al. (8) 0.020 388 0.699 −0.094 388 0.066
Tharek et al. (20) −0.322 340 < 0.001 −0.177 340 0.001
Yap et al. (22) −0.374 143 < 0.001 −0.467 143 < 0.001
Total 2519
Meta-analysis, fixed effect (95% CI) −0.095 (−0.134, −0.056) < 0.001 −0.100 (−0.138 to −0.061) < 0.001
Meta-analysis, random effect (95% CI) −0.140 (−0.286, 0.012) 0.072 −0.123 (−0.229 to −0.014) 0.028
Heterogeneity (I2) 93% 87%

Notes: CI = confidence interval; N1, N2 = sample sizes