Table 5.
Correlation coefficient between SDSCA and HbA1c at study level and meta-analysis
Study | Correlation for SDSCA total score (95% CI) | N1 | P-value | Correlation for SDSCA diet subscale (95% CI) | N2 | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahmad Sharoni et al. (13) | −0.498 | 200 | < 0.001 | −0.014 | 200 | 0.843 |
Chew et al. (14) | 0.126 | 283 | 0.035 | 0.081 | 298 | 0.163 |
Jannoo et al. (16) | 0.017 | 392 | 0.732 | −0.010 | 392 | 0.850 |
Nur Khairul Bariyyah et al. (18) | 0.046 | 442 | 0.335 | −0.022 | 499 | 0.630 |
Papo et al. (19) | −0.100 | 331 | 0.069 | −0.285 | 331 | < 0.001 |
Siti Khuzaimah et al. (8) | 0.020 | 388 | 0.699 | −0.094 | 388 | 0.066 |
Tharek et al. (20) | −0.322 | 340 | < 0.001 | −0.177 | 340 | 0.001 |
Yap et al. (22) | −0.374 | 143 | < 0.001 | −0.467 | 143 | < 0.001 |
Total | 2519 | |||||
Meta-analysis, fixed effect (95% CI) | −0.095 (−0.134, −0.056) | < 0.001 | −0.100 (−0.138 to −0.061) | < 0.001 | ||
Meta-analysis, random effect (95% CI) | −0.140 (−0.286, 0.012) | 0.072 | −0.123 (−0.229 to −0.014) | 0.028 | ||
Heterogeneity (I2) | 93% | 87% |
Notes: CI = confidence interval; N1, N2 = sample sizes