Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35733

Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the intercanine widths and the canine rotation angle at two assessment times in the three groups and the results of significance test†.

† Employing one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal-Wallis test, SD: Standard Deviation, Min: minimum, Max: maximum, CI: confidence interval, T0: before the beginning of orthodontic treatment, T4: at the end of the leveling and alignment phase, Group 1: traditional brackets group, Group 2: self-ligating brackets group, Group 3: self-ligating brackets + flapless piezocision group, NS: there was no statistically significant difference at P > 0.05, **: there was a statistically significant difference at P < 0.01

ANOVA: analysis of variance

Time Group Mean SD Min Max 95% CI for difference P-value Significance
            Lower bound Upper bound    
Intercanine width at the cusps level
T0 Group 1 34.23 0.91 33.00 36.40 33.80 34.66 0.477 NS
Group 2 34.56 1.24 33.00 37.20 33.96 35.16
Group 3 34.81 1.34 33.00 36.90 34.16 35.46
T4 Group 1 35.40 0.90 34.10 37.40 34.97 35.82 0.005 **
Group 2 36.55 1.29 34.20 39.00 35.93 37.18
Group 3 36.73 1.69 34.20 39.00 35.92 37.55
Intercanine width at the cervical level from the lingual side
T0 Group 1 26.44 1.28 24.20 29.10 25.84 27.04 0.461 NS
Group 2 26.95 1.38 24.80 29.80 26.28 27.62
Group 3 27.05 1.75 24.50 29.40 26.20 27.89
T4 Group 1 27.27 1.31 25.10 29.70 26.65 27.88 0.329 NS
Group 2 27.76 1.32 25.70 30.40 27.12 28.40
Group 3 27.93 1.63 25.20 30.20 27.14 28.71
Canine rotation angle
T0 Group 1 46.19 7.87 34.40 62.90 42.50 49.87 0.894 NS
Group 2 37.02 11.40 13.70 52.90 31.52 42.52
Group 3 47.01 14.24 9.10 74.30 40.15 53.88
T4 Group 1 41.61 3.31 34.70 47.50 40.06 43.16 0.592 NS
Group 2 40.81 3.70 36.10 47.40 39.03 42.59
Group 3 41.61 3.61 36.30 49.30 39.87 43.35